On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 18:43:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 6/26/15 11:03 AM, extrawurst wrote:
>> On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 16:42:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 6/26/15 9:28 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
>>>> On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 15:54:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>>> Please continue to spread the love (twitter, reddit, hackernews,
>>>>> facebook, your blog...):
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmRmfoKxMCE
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W6uhX6AITM
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W6uhX6AITM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrei
>>>>
>>>> Last two are the same video.
>>>
>>> Sorry. So we have:
>>>
>>> Chuck Allison: https://youtube.com/watch?v=rmRmfoKxMCE
>>> Liran Zvibel: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1W6uhX6AITM
>>> Mihails Strasuns: https://youtube.com/watch?v=kDu0lgwqHKM
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>
>> Awesome! Is it planned to add the video links to dconf.org ?
>
> It "is" planned inasmuch people send pull requests for it. -- Andrei

Boom!

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dconf.org/pull/82

On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 20:32:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> Monday morning is probably a better time, due to Reddit usage patterns. Weekends tend to not get nearly so much traffic.

Also, I completely spaced that I'll be on the road all day and not back until Tuesday. It'll have to be someone else.

On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 18:43:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> It "is" planned inasmuch people send pull requests for it. -- Andrei

A pull request was submitted a couple of days ago.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dconf.org/pull/81
I added these new videos today.

There's work getting done would only take a few seconds to review.  They just need someone with authority or a subject-matter expert (yes, I know they are in short supply).

Just need someone to hit the button:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1000

Trivial (10 seconds max), but need a subject matter expert:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1022
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/859
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/996
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1303
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1302
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4753

Should probably be closed to remove the clutter:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1009

Mike

On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 19:03:11 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
> I don't want to sound negative but the editing of Chuck's talk could be a lot better IMHO. Round about 30:00 he describes a code example which isn't shown in the video!. He's making multiple references to lines/code etc. that were visible to the attendees at the conference but aren't visible on the video.
>
> Having seen it in person, Chuck's talk was a *great* advocacy of D. But seeing it second time round on youtube I'm not feeling it the same way :-(
>
> I appreciate the work that UVU have put in to making the talks available so I *really* don't mean to sound unappreciative or disrespectful, but I think in this case it might make sense to go back and revisit this particular talk. Specifically when Chuck is talking about a specific code sample / line of code, it needs to be put into the video. Otherwise context is completely lost and viewers will be left confused + bewildered.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy.

There have been a few responses agreeing with me. Chucks talk was awesome but the current edit doesn't do it justice. Is there any way this can be fed back to UVU/Chuck etc.?

Cheers,

A

On 6/27/15 6:37 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 19:03:11 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
>> I don't want to sound negative but the editing of Chuck's talk could
>> be a lot better IMHO. Round about 30:00 he describes a code example
>> which isn't shown in the video!. He's making multiple references to
>> lines/code etc. that were visible to the attendees at the conference
>> but aren't visible on the video.
>>
>> Having seen it in person, Chuck's talk was a *great* advocacy of D.
>> But seeing it second time round on youtube I'm not feeling it the same
>> way :-(
>>
>> I appreciate the work that UVU have put in to making the talks
>> available so I *really* don't mean to sound unappreciative or
>> disrespectful, but I think in this case it might make sense to go back
>> and revisit this particular talk. Specifically when Chuck is talking
>> about a specific code sample / line of code, it needs to be put into
>> the video. Otherwise context is completely lost and viewers will be
>> left confused + bewildered.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Andy.
>
> There have been a few responses agreeing with me. Chucks talk was
> awesome but the current edit doesn't do it justice. Is there any way
> this can be fed back to UVU/Chuck etc.?

Did so. -- Andrei

>> There have been a few responses agreeing with me. Chucks talk was
>> awesome but the current edit doesn't do it justice. Is there any way
>> this can be fed back to UVU/Chuck etc.?
>
> Did so. -- Andrei

Cheers!

A.

On Saturday, 27 June 2015 at 13:59:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 6/27/15 6:37 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
>>
>> There have been a few responses agreeing with me. Chucks talk was
>> awesome but the current edit doesn't do it justice. Is there any way
>> this can be fed back to UVU/Chuck etc.?
>
> Did so. -- Andrei

While we are sending them feedback could they include the talk titles in the YouTube titles to make them easier to find.

The editing overall has been great. I've been pleasantly surprised. I was kind of expecting a fixed camera thrown up by an undergrad for some extra credit. It's really great that the change in venue hasn't resulted in a drop in video quality.