Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
October 10, 2010 [Issue 5036] New: Remove caching from ranges | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5036 Summary: Remove caching from ranges Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: tomeksowi@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Tomasz Sowiński <tomeksowi@gmail.com> 2010-10-10 14:38:28 PDT --- All higher-order ranges in Phobos should not cache their element values. Such known ranges are: std.algorithm.Map and std.range.Sequence. A Cached range should be introduced to make up for the loss. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 10, 2010 [Issue 5036] Remove caching from ranges | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Tomasz Sowiński | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5036 Tomasz Sowiński <tomeksowi@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@puremagic.com |andrei@metalanguage.com -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
February 26, 2013 [Issue 5036] Remove caching from ranges | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Tomasz Sowiński | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5036 --- Comment #1 from Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei@erdani.com> 2013-02-26 08:56:37 PST --- Hm, I think things are fine as they are, though I agree with the consistency argument. Agree to close? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
February 26, 2013 [Issue 5036] Remove caching from ranges | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Tomasz Sowiński | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5036 --- Comment #2 from Tomasz Sowiński <tomeksowi@gmail.com> 2013-02-26 12:28:04 PST --- The argument was the least about consistency, I recall caching got in the way when the mapped to element was: - used <= 1 times - trivial to calculate (faster than read/write) - manually allocated (harder to anticipate destruction) Plus, front/back vs. opIndex poses problems of their own. Why the obligation to cache? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation