http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212


Artem Borisovskiy <kolos80@bk.ru> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
                 CC|                            |kolos80@bk.ru
           Severity|enhancement                 |normal


-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212


Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |maxim@maxim-fomin.ru


--- Comment #10 from Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> 2013-04-17 22:47:24 PDT ---
*** Issue 9527 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212


Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |code@dawg.eu
            Summary|Safer typesafe variadics    |no escape analysis for
                   |                            |typesafe variadic function
                   |                            |arguments


--- Comment #11 from Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> 2013-04-17 22:59:40 PDT ---
Without escape analysis these functions are not memory @safe. Maybe we should think about this in conjunction with scope ref, http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36#.40safe_concerns.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212



--- Comment #12 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-04-19 16:00:33 PDT ---
This topic was discussed again in D.learn:

http://forum.dlang.org/thread/whlxkcbvkldtmfezucts@forum.dlang.org

An improvement of my idea is that when you use "scope":

this(scope int[] args_...) {

The compiler doesn't perfom the dup (and doesn't allow you to escape the data).

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------