On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 21:08:04 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 20:56:33 UTC, sigod wrote:
>> On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 20:25:02 UTC, sigod wrote:
>>> Few issues with help dialog (opened with Shift+H):
>>> - Centers on full page instead of only visible part of it.
>>> - Scrolls with page.
>>
>> `fixed` instead of [`absolute`][0] and it should be fixed. (Heh, funny.)
>
> Thanks, fixed.
>
>> Also, I believe closing popup on `mouseup` in popup itself doesn't create good UX. Better to close it on `click` outside of popup (maybe difficult to implement without overlay) and to provide an "X" (close) button in popup.
>
> Yes, you're right. The popup isn't a big part of the UI, however, and you can dismiss it by pressing any key.

I'll try to create PR for this in upcoming days.

Also, I just noticed: when you open direct link linked post appears on the bottom of the page instead of the top. For example: http://beta.forum.dlang.org/post/gbzgmtrjpnsexfasxawj@beta.forum.dlang.org

On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 21:23:19 UTC, sigod wrote:
> Also, I just noticed: when you open direct link linked post appears on the bottom of the page instead of the top. For example: http://beta.forum.dlang.org/post/gbzgmtrjpnsexfasxawj@beta.forum.dlang.org

Chrome weirdness. Push fixed.

On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 21:32:36 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> Chrome weirdness. Push fixed.

Thanks. It was fast. :)

On 06/04/2015 03:41 PM, Mattcoder wrote:
>
> PS: I think you could increase the font size a bit on the top links(
> Index » Announce / Log in · Settings · Help) and the page numbers on the
> bottom, at least for mobile.
>

Yea, they are hard to hit accurately on mobile (but then, I'm usually in the habit of zooming in before even *attempting* to click on a link on that tiny 5" screen. Luckily, the Dolphin browser has handy zoom buttons (!) so I don't have to shift my grip to a two-handed deal just to use the overrated pinch-zoom.)

On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 21:10:13 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> I don't know how things are now, but when I tried to move to
>> Vibe.d
>> (which was several years ago), you had to do some strange
>> acrobatics in
>> order to read the same connection in one fiber but write to it
>> from
>> another. In ae.net, reads are handled by callbacks, and all
>> writes are
>> delayed (data is queued and sent when the socket loop says the
>> socket is
>> writable), which means there is no contention and you can
>> "write" to any
>> socket from anywhere in the program (as long as it's in the
>> same thread).
>
> This has been solved in the meantime. Reads and writes can now occur concurrently in different fibers.

Good to know. What about writing from multiple fibers to the same connection (e.g. an IRC client that needs to send PINGs from a timer fiber and also announce events coming from other fibers)? IIRC a connection's input/output streams needed to be explicitly associated with a fiber?

Any change of making the D Logo redirect to dlang.org rather than the forum itself?

On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 00:06:04 UTC, Charles wrote:
> Any change of making the D Logo redirect to dlang.org rather than the forum itself?

No, I'm very used to clicking the logo to back to the forum index, and I suspect so are many others.

You can use the "D Home" links to go to dlang.org.

On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 15:04:05 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> http://beta.forum.dlang.org/
>

This is really nice.

It appears the horizontal split puts the latest thread at the bottom of the list instead of the top.  I think that should be reversed.

Mike

On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 00:34:27 UTC, Mike wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 15:04:05 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>> http://beta.forum.dlang.org/
>>
>
> This is really nice.
>
> It appears the horizontal split puts the latest thread at the bottom of the list instead of the top.  I think that should be reversed.

I think not, as that would mean that threads are sorted in one direction, but posts within a thread are sorted in another.

On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 00:37:20 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:

>> It appears the horizontal split puts the latest thread at the bottom of the list instead of the top.  I think that should be reversed.
>
> I think not, as that would mean that threads are sorted in one direction, but posts within a thread are sorted in another.

That seems natural to me.