July 18, 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463



--- Comment #130 from Trass3r <mrmocool@gmx.de> 2011-07-18 06:10:29 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #126)
> Why not just add an additional garbage collector with this new implementation and leave the old one as it is and then developers can choose which one to use at link time.

That's an excellent idea.
I mean there are at least 3 GC "improvement projects" that need extensive
testing:
- this suggestion
- https://github.com/dsimcha/druntime/wiki/Druntime-GC-Optimization-Fork
- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/tree/CDGC/src/gc

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
July 18, 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463



--- Comment #131 from David Simcha <dsimcha@yahoo.com> 2011-07-18 08:54:57 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #130)
> (In reply to comment #126)
> > Why not just add an additional garbage collector with this new implementation and leave the old one as it is and then developers can choose which one to use at link time.
> 
> That's an excellent idea.
> I mean there are at least 3 GC "improvement projects" that need extensive
> testing:
> - this suggestion
> - https://github.com/dsimcha/druntime/wiki/Druntime-GC-Optimization-Fork

The GC optimization fork was relatively simple, low-hanging fruit optimizations.  This was merged in a long time ago, and was in the 2.053 release.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
March 08, 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463


Jameson <beatgammit@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |beatgammit@gmail.com


--- Comment #132 from Jameson <beatgammit@gmail.com> 2013-03-08 11:38:39 PST ---
What's the status of this?

I think this post hints at what I want to know:

http://forum.dlang.org/post/k9cg21$132k$1@digitalmars.com

Did this actually get into 2.062? It doesn't seem so by the changelog.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
March 08, 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463



--- Comment #133 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-03-08 11:48:39 PST ---
(In reply to comment #132)

> Did this actually get into 2.062?

I don't think so.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 30, 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463


Leandro Lucarella <leandro.lucarella@sociomantic.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wfunction@hotmail.com


--- Comment #134 from Leandro Lucarella <leandro.lucarella@sociomantic.com> 2013-05-30 04:54:25 PDT ---
*** Issue 7251 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Next ›   Last »