Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 10, 2013 [Issue 10320] New: Warning for old-style operator overloading methods definition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10320 Summary: Warning for old-style operator overloading methods definition Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs@eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-06-10 04:49:26 PDT --- I suggest to introduce a warning that lists all the usages of the old-style operator overloading. (Later they will become deprecated, and then they will be removed (or conditionally compiled out for D2 if you want to keep the code for D1 for some more time)). Rationale: to simplify the D2 compiler. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
July 02, 2013 [Issue 10320] Warning for old-style operator overloading methods definition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10320 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-07-02 01:01:58 PDT --- Cases like in this thread show that it's important to give a warning now: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/hwfzaysrfxiiumppxwkt@forum.dlang.org -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
July 02, 2013 [Issue 10320] Warning for old-style operator overloading methods definition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10320 monarchdodra@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |monarchdodra@gmail.com See Also| |http://d.puremagic.com/issu | |es/show_bug.cgi?id=9257 --- Comment #2 from monarchdodra@gmail.com 2013-07-02 04:51:42 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Cases like in this thread show that it's important to give a warning now: > > http://forum.dlang.org/thread/hwfzaysrfxiiumppxwkt@forum.dlang.org Related (but not duplicate) is also Issue 9257 - [ER] New optional "operator" keyword to validate magic functions http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9257 And associated discussion: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/iubdngjksicwxugrqesc@forum.dlang.org -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation