Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
August 06, 2013 Component programming with ranges | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Vote up! http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1jtzez/component_programming_with_ranges/ Andrei |
August 06, 2013 Re: Component programming with ranges | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | Andrei Alexandrescu: > http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1jtzez/component_programming_with_ranges/ It's an interesting article, but I wrote some comments. Not even some answers before posting that to Reddit? http://forum.dlang.org/thread/20130802052432.GA495@quickfur.ath.cx#post-ibbicmqochwtirxdbmud:40forum.dlang.org Bye, bearophile |
August 07, 2013 Re: Component programming with ranges | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | On 08/06/2013 12:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Vote up!
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1jtzez/component_programming_with_ranges/
>
>
> Andrei
>
>
This article is excellent.
Some notes:
1) More recent versions of std.datetime makes it possible to write 1.days instead of dur!"days"(1)
From:
.recurrence!((a,n) => a[n-1] + dur!"days"(1))
To:
.recurrence!((a,n) => a[n-1] + 1.days)
2) It is mildly annoying that sometimes it is more convenient to do non-trivial processings in .front rather than .popFront. The problem of doing so is that the user of the code may call .front multiple times assuming that the result is a reference to an already processed data when in fact each call consumes CPU cycles.
3) I haven't compiled the code but it looks like some of the signature constraints can be simplified by taking advantage of isDateRange() more.
Ali
|
August 07, 2013 Re: Component programming with ranges | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | On 6-8-2013 21:56, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Vote up!
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1jtzez/component_programming_with_ranges/
>
> Andrei
>
>
If I understand it correctly "chunkBy" cannot accept a string lambda, due to the
template constraint. Therefore the line
alias attr = unaryFun!attrFun;
seems unnecessary to me.
By the way, when I try the code from github, it only prints the first 3 months.
DMD32 D Compiler v2.063 (win7 64)
|
August 09, 2013 Re: Component programming with ranges | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 12:56:48 -0700 Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote: > Vote up! > > http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1jtzez/component_programming_with_ranges/ > Great article. Even as an experienced D user, it really gave me a lot to think about. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation