Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May 24, 2013 [Issue 10162] New: Opposite of std.string.representation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10162 Summary: Opposite of std.string.representation Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs@eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-05-24 05:21:01 PDT --- I suggest to add to Phobos a simple (unsafe) function that does the opposite of std.string.representation. An use case is for sorting an array of chars. sort() can't be used on a char[], so you have to conver it to ubyte[] with "representation", but later often you want an array of chars again): char[] word = ...; immutable key = word.representation.sort().release.unrepresentation.assumeUnique; Or if you start with a word: string word = ...; immutable key = word.dup.representation.sort().release.unrepresentation.assumeUnique; Such "unrepresentation" function is not safe. If you want to make it a bit safer its post-condition can run std.utf.validate on the result in non-release mode. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
July 26, 2013 [Issue 10162] Opposite of std.string.representation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10162 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-07-26 10:34:57 PDT --- An alternative name for such function is "assumeChars". And it should return char[], const(char)[] or immutable(char)[] according to the input being a ubyte[], const(ubyte)[] or immutable(ubyte)[]. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
July 26, 2013 [Issue 10162] Opposite of std.string.representation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10162 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-07-26 10:36:22 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) It could also return wchar[], const(wchar)[], immutable(wchar)[] according to the input being a ushort[], const(ushort)[] or immutable(ushort)[]. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
September 03, 2013 [Issue 10162] Opposite of std.string.representation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10162 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-09-03 09:41:37 PDT --- Most of my use cases are to sort a char[]. It's a common operation. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 30, 2013 [Issue 10162] Opposite of std.string.representation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10162 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-10-30 12:42:15 PDT --- See also Issue 11356 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation