Thread overview | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 22, 2013 [Issue 9565] New: Index of static array should not print literal suffix | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9565 Summary: Index of static array should not print literal suffix Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: k.hara.pg@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> 2013-02-21 20:56:52 PST --- Index type of static array is always size_t, so suffix is not only just redundant, but also is harmful for platform independent diagnostic message. alias T = int[10]; pragma(msg, T); // should print `int[10]` rather than `int[10u]` or `int[10LU]`. Similar problem exists in IndexExp and SliceExp int[] arr; pragma(msg, (arr[0]).stringof); // arr[cast(uint)0] pragma(msg, (arr[0..1]).stringof); // arr[cast(uint)0..cast(uint)1] // should print arr[0] and arr[0..1] But, it would need to keep "cast(...)" output for some cases pragma(msg, (arr[int.min]).stringof); // arr[cast(uint)-2147483648] -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
February 22, 2013 [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kenji Hara | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9565 bearophile_hugs@eml.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bearophile_hugs@eml.cc --- Comment #1 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-02-22 03:05:12 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) > But, it would need to keep "cast(...)" output for some cases > > pragma(msg, (arr[int.min]).stringof); // arr[cast(uint)-2147483648] I'd even like D to statically refuse indexing an array with a -2147483648 index :-) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
February 22, 2013 [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kenji Hara | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9565 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2013-02-22 11:16:16 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) > Index type of static array is always size_t, so suffix is not only just redundant, but also is harmful for platform independent diagnostic message. I think the reason it's there is to make the actual literal valid, because AFAIK you actually need to append "LU" for some big literals. But maybe we could remove the suffixes for small literals. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
March 01, 2013 [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kenji Hara | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9565 --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> 2013-03-01 02:35:57 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Index type of static array is always size_t, so suffix is not only just redundant, but also is harmful for platform independent diagnostic message. > > I think the reason it's there is to make the actual literal valid, because AFAIK you actually need to append "LU" for some big literals. But maybe we could remove the suffixes for small literals. You are right. if the dimension is in (long.max, ulong.max], "LU" suffix is necessary. (If LU is not there, "signed integer overflow" error will occur in lexer). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
September 04, 2013 [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kenji Hara | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9565 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |pull --- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> 2013-09-03 17:30:22 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2522 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
September 04, 2013 [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kenji Hara | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9565 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzilla@puremagic.com 2013-09-04 07:58:50 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/5fac5f8949ae22e8d8168e8b48eff57fef052b9b Additional fix for issue 9565 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/b79d1111e7eb7d30a566c1238d35c9fb82b0e572 Merge pull request #1544 from 9rnsr/fix9565 Additional fix for issue 9565 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
September 15, 2013 [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kenji Hara | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9565 --- Comment #6 from github-bugzilla@puremagic.com 2013-09-15 00:36:45 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/d1ab5012b00c34023ed715a0c22ecb3bd8b674ff fix Issue 9565 - Index of static array should not print literal suffix Static array type index is always size_t, so unnecessary suffix is harmful for platform independent diagnostic message. (Note that: In 64bit platform, size_t is ulong, and if the value is greater than long.max, suffix is *necessary*.) Same problem exists in IndexExp and SliceExp printing. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/724566600724314a27dbf7bfd63aeda12f27780d Merge pull request #2522 from 9rnsr/fix9565 Issue 9565 - Index of static array should not print literal suffix -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
September 15, 2013 [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kenji Hara | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9565 Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |bugzilla@digitalmars.com Resolution| |FIXED Severity|normal |enhancement -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
September 29, 2013 [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kenji Hara | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9565 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzilla@puremagic.com 2013-09-28 19:33:49 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/1c1633533435c48aac8811f41dabb4009da61bd0 Fixup for issue 9565 Remove unnecessary else block so right not it's never used. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/d744bec6d4500d6cb6f43011beefc7765dd0e5ce Merge pull request #1605 from 9rnsr/fix9565 Fixup for issue 9565 - cleanup of #1544 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation