September 04, 2013
I'm new to D, from what I read in Reddit these days, it's really really bad that D's supporter always claim that D support Manual Memory Management and GC can be disabled , despite the truth that druntime/phobos are parts of D to an end user!
I dislike GC but I dislike misleading much more!
September 04, 2013
On 9/3/13 11:13 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 4 September 2013 06:02, Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I imagine D does well in discussion largely due to the amount Walter and
>> Andrei bombard reddit with links.
>>
>
> a.k.a.  Walterbot and Andralexbot.

Andralexdroid, surely?
September 04, 2013
On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 at 14:36:42 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
> On 9/3/13 11:13 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 4 September 2013 06:02, Peter Alexander
> Andralexdroid, surely?

alexandroid :)
September 04, 2013
On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 at 05:02:06 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 at 17:09:04 UTC, Michael wrote:


Main line is positive trend over all year ;)
September 06, 2013
On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 at 13:13:11 UTC, Elvis wrote:
> http://adambard.com/blog/top-github-languages-for-2013-so-far/

Well D is now a bit higher on tiobe, position 22 (August 2013). It has been, for a very long time, on position 36.

Is there any push of getting vibed and gtkd in ubuntu before the LTS release?
September 13, 2013
On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 15:28:53 UTC, sclytrack wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 at 13:13:11 UTC, Elvis wrote:
>> http://adambard.com/blog/top-github-languages-for-2013-so-far/
>
> Well D is now a bit higher on tiobe, position 22 (August 2013). It has been, for a very long time, on position 36.
>
> Is there any push of getting vibed and gtkd in ubuntu before the LTS release?

Well D is now position 39 (September 2013)!
September 13, 2013
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 15:38:16 UTC, Zhouxuan wrote:
> On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 15:28:53 UTC, sclytrack wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 at 13:13:11 UTC, Elvis wrote:
>>> http://adambard.com/blog/top-github-languages-for-2013-so-far/
>>
>> Well D is now a bit higher on tiobe, position 22 (August 2013). It has been, for a very long time, on position 36.
>>
>> Is there any push of getting vibed and gtkd in ubuntu before the LTS release?
>
> Well D is now position 39 (September 2013)!

http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
September 14, 2013
>> Well D is now position 39 (September 2013)!

Challenge accepted)))

September 14, 2013
On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 at 07:04:01 UTC, Elvis wrote:
> I'm new to D, from what I read in Reddit these days, it's really really bad that D's supporter always claim that D support Manual Memory Management and GC can be disabled , despite the truth that druntime/phobos are parts of D to an end user!
> I dislike GC but I dislike misleading much more!

It's really possible.

You can use malloc/free for manual memory management. For example, Vibe.d use it, and it's really fast.

You can disable automatic GC run and run GC manually:
http://dlang.org/phobos/core_memory.html

Also, you can remove GC at all:
https://bitbucket.org/timosi/minlibd/overview
September 15, 2013
On Saturday, 14 September 2013 at 12:19:18 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 at 07:04:01 UTC, Elvis wrote:
>> I'm new to D, from what I read in Reddit these days, it's really really bad that D's supporter always claim that D support Manual Memory Management and GC can be disabled , despite the truth that druntime/phobos are parts of D to an end user!
>> I dislike GC but I dislike misleading much more!
>
> It's really possible.
>
> You can use malloc/free for manual memory management. For example, Vibe.d use it, and it's really fast.

Wrong.
Vibe.d uses partial manual memory management but can't get rid of GC completely (and it hurts in certain situations hard)

> You can disable automatic GC run and run GC manually:
> http://dlang.org/phobos/core_memory.html
>
> Also, you can remove GC at all:
> https://bitbucket.org/timosi/minlibd/overview

It is the very same misadvertising. No one cares about what you can. D has inline assembly, you can possibly do anything. What does matter and what people expect is doing something conveniently. And D is not there right now.

Again, it can become much better with relatively few tweaks to the compiler. But it is not _right now_ and that is the only thing that does matter.