Thread overview | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
October 02, 2013 [Issue 11160] New: Bitfield compilation error with degenerate bitfields of length 32 & 64 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11160 Summary: Bitfield compilation error with degenerate bitfields of length 32 & 64 Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com 2013-10-02 16:42:58 PDT --- According to the documentation the only constraint on bitfields is: "The sum of all bit lengths in one bitfield instantiation must be exactly 8, 16, 32, or 64." The current implementation support degenerate bitfields with field lengths 8 and 16. For example: mixin(bitfields!(uint, "x", 8, int, "y", 8)); mixin(bitfields!(uint, "x", 8, int, "y", 8, int, "z", 16)); But not with 32 and 64 as length. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 02, 2013 [Issue 11160] Bitfield compilation error with degenerate bitfields of length 32 & 64 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11160 --- Comment #1 from safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com 2013-10-02 16:44:12 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1256) Proposed fix Note: I could not use integer exponentiation with overflow due to #11159, so I used ~0 with shifts. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 03, 2013 [Issue 11160] Bitfield compilation error with degenerate bitfields of length 32 & 64 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11160 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2013-10-02 19:06:06 PDT --- Dupe of Issue 8474? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 03, 2013 [Issue 11160] Bitfield compilation error with degenerate bitfields of length 32 & 64 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11160 --- Comment #3 from safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com 2013-10-02 20:00:53 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Dupe of Issue 8474? This issue is a dupe of 8474, but the code in 8474 includes all kinds of enhancements squashed into a non-atomic commit. The author never created a pull request despite referring to one in the 4 issues mentioned below. In this case, which one should be marked duplicate? Looking at bunch of linked bitmanip bugs referenced in the commit message for the code in issue 8474: Issue 6686 is a dupe of issue 5942, but both should be resolved as worksforme with current std.bitmanip. Issue 4935 also worksforme. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 03, 2013 [Issue 11160] Bitfield compilation error with degenerate bitfields of length 32 & 64 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11160 --- Comment #4 from safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com 2013-10-02 20:29:48 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The author never created a pull request despite referring to one in the 4 issues mentioned below. Actually found the pull requests using google (PR 1045, 719, 734,740.) All closed but don't appear merged. Anyways, using DPaste 6686/ 5942 were fixed between 2.060 and 2.063. 4935 was fixed prior to 2.060. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 03, 2013 [Issue 11160] Bitfield compilation error with degenerate bitfields of length 32 & 64 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11160 safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |pull --- Comment #5 from safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com 2013-10-03 07:50:40 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1613 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 05, 2013 [Issue 11160] Bitfield compilation error with degenerate bitfields of length 32 & 64 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to safety0ff.bugz@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11160 David Nadlinger <code@klickverbot.at> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |code@klickverbot.at Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #6 from David Nadlinger <code@klickverbot.at> 2013-10-05 08:18:03 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1613 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation