On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 06:42:58 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
>
>
> On 16.10.2013 14:33, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>> * How complete is the debugging info for DMD-Win64? Is it fully
>> implemented, and/or are there any issues or limitations? (Rainer you are
>> likely the best to answer this one)
>
> The stock compiler does not do the replacement '@' for '.' which confuses the Visual Studio debugger when inspecting class members.
>
> The debug info emitted for win64 should more or less be the same as for Win32 (which is only basic to begin with).

i need halp!11

during testing Brad Anderson's dmd beta x64 setup(http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ebrbcdmsothbutakrzsn@forum.dlang.org) i've encountered a serious problem, compiled x64 programs works, but i'm totally unable to debug them. what's the problem? (visuald says something like "cannot launch debugger on 'program path', hr=89710016)

On 17.10.2013 08:47, evilrat wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 06:42:58 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16.10.2013 14:33, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>>> * How complete is the debugging info for DMD-Win64? Is it fully
>>> implemented, and/or are there any issues or limitations? (Rainer you are
>>> likely the best to answer this one)
>>
>> The stock compiler does not do the replacement '@' for '.' which
>> confuses the Visual Studio debugger when inspecting class members.
>>
>> The debug info emitted for win64 should more or less be the same as
>> for Win32 (which is only basic to begin with).
>
> i need halp!11
>
> during testing Brad Anderson's dmd beta x64
> setup(http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ebrbcdmsothbutakrzsn@forum.dlang.org) i've
> encountered a serious problem, compiled x64 programs works, but i'm
> totally unable to debug them. what's the problem? (visuald says
> something like "cannot launch debugger on 'program path', hr=89710016)

please see my reply there.