On 2013-10-17 15:53, Sönke Ludwig wrote:

> Added APSL-2.0 (Apple Public Source License) and MS-PL (Microsoft Public
> License).

Cool, thanks.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

Am 17.10.2013 16:59, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
> On 2013-10-17 15:44, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>
>> Not necessarily, but possibly, so it probably has to cope with it.
>>
>> One possibility to handle your example would be to make different sub
>> packages for the two targets.
>
> What's happens then with the main/super package, in regards to licensing?
>

It's independent as long as it doesn't explicitly add the submodules as dependencies. If it does add them, it would have to add both licenses. But other packages can still only reference a sub package if they want.

Am 17.10.2013 17:02, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
> Am 17.10.2013 16:59, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
>> On 2013-10-17 15:44, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>>
>>> Not necessarily, but possibly, so it probably has to cope with it.
>>>
>>> One possibility to handle your example would be to make different sub
>>> packages for the two targets.
>>
>> What's happens then with the main/super package, in regards to licensing?
>>
>
> It's independent as long as it doesn't explicitly add the submodules as
> dependencies. If it does add them, it would have to add both licenses.
> But other packages can still only reference a sub package if they want.

s/only reference a/just reference a single/

Am 16.10.2013 21:01, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
> The DUB package registry [1] has finally gained support for the text and
> category based search of packages. There is also a category for D
> standard library candidate modules, as has been suggested recently.
>
> If you already have any registered packages, please log in and add the
> proper categories to each of them ("My packages" -> click on package
> name). Should there be no exact category match, and that specific
> category is likely to have multiple entries in the future, please make a
> corresponding pull request against the category file [2] on GitHub.
>
> It's still all a little rough around the edges. Any bugs can be reported
> on the issue tracker [3] or discussed in the forum [4].
>
> [1]: http://code.dlang.org
> [2]:
> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dub-registry/blob/master/categories.json
>
> [3]: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dub-registry/issues
> [4]: http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.dub/

Now also with JavaScript support for switching categories and alphabetic sorting.

On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 18:22:02 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Am 16.10.2013 21:01, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
>> The DUB package registry [1] has finally gained support for the text and
>> category based search of packages. There is also a category for D
>> standard library candidate modules, as has been suggested recently.
>>
>> If you already have any registered packages, please log in and add the
>> proper categories to each of them ("My packages" -> click on package
>> name). Should there be no exact category match, and that specific
>> category is likely to have multiple entries in the future, please make a
>> corresponding pull request against the category file [2] on GitHub.
>>
>> It's still all a little rough around the edges. Any bugs can be reported
>> on the issue tracker [3] or discussed in the forum [4].
>>
>> [1]: http://code.dlang.org
>> [2]:
>> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dub-registry/blob/master/categories.json
>>
>> [3]: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dub-registry/issues
>> [4]: http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.dub/
>
> Now also with JavaScript support for switching categories and alphabetic sorting.

The website is a bit "jumpy" for me in Firefox upon navigation.
As if it loads without the CSS for a moment, and then restores.

code.dlang.org

Does we should have cats? maybe the organization by tags is better?

Am 18.10.2013 08:47, schrieb Suliman:
> code.dlang.org
>
> Does we should have cats? maybe the organization by tags is better?

You mean like a flat list of tags?

Currently it's something like hierarchical tags. Each package can have multiple categories, and the specific categories, as well as the ancestor categories will all match.

But one thing that I'd like to improve is the UI for category selection and make it hierarchical and step by step (like the path navigation of e.g. modern Windows Explorer). Also maybe the hierarchy itself could be improved (it's in a very ad-hoc state), so that there is less redundancy and selecting multiple tags/categories is used to disambiguate instead.

Am 17.10.2013 20:25, schrieb Tourist:
> On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 18:22:02 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> Am 16.10.2013 21:01, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
>>> The DUB package registry [1] has finally gained support for the text and
>>> category based search of packages. There is also a category for D
>>> standard library candidate modules, as has been suggested recently.
>>>
>>> If you already have any registered packages, please log in and add the
>>> proper categories to each of them ("My packages" -> click on package
>>> name). Should there be no exact category match, and that specific
>>> category is likely to have multiple entries in the future, please make a
>>> corresponding pull request against the category file [2] on GitHub.
>>>
>>> It's still all a little rough around the edges. Any bugs can be reported
>>> on the issue tracker [3] or discussed in the forum [4].
>>>
>>> [1]: http://code.dlang.org
>>> [2]:
>>> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dub-registry/blob/master/categories.json
>>>
>>>
>>> [3]: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dub-registry/issues
>>> [4]: http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.dub/
>>
>> Now also with JavaScript support for switching categories and
>> alphabetic sorting.
>
> The website is a bit "jumpy" for me in Firefox upon navigation.
> As if it loads without the CSS for a moment, and then restores.

I could barely reproduce it, but it looks like the cache headers that the server sent caused the CSS to be re-requested for every page load. Should be fixed now.

On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 10:23:20 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Am 17.10.2013 20:25, schrieb Tourist:
>> On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 18:22:02 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>>> Am 16.10.2013 21:01, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
>>>> The DUB package registry [1] has finally gained support for the text and
>>>> category based search of packages. There is also a category for D
>>>> standard library candidate modules, as has been suggested recently.
>>>>
>>>> If you already have any registered packages, please log in and add the
>>>> proper categories to each of them ("My packages" -> click on package
>>>> name). Should there be no exact category match, and that specific
>>>> category is likely to have multiple entries in the future, please make a
>>>> corresponding pull request against the category file [2] on GitHub.
>>>>
>>>> It's still all a little rough around the edges. Any bugs can be reported
>>>> on the issue tracker [3] or discussed in the forum [4].
>>>>
>>>> [1]: http://code.dlang.org
>>>> [2]:
>>>> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dub-registry/blob/master/categories.json
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [3]: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dub-registry/issues
>>>> [4]: http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.dub/
>>>
>>> Now also with JavaScript support for switching categories and
>>> alphabetic sorting.
>>
>> The website is a bit "jumpy" for me in Firefox upon navigation.
>> As if it loads without the CSS for a moment, and then restores.
>
> I could barely reproduce it, but it looks like the cache headers that the server sent caused the CSS to be re-requested for every page load. Should be fixed now.

Yep, the issue is gone.
Good job!

On 10/16/13, Sönke Ludwig <sludwig@outerproduct.org> wrote:
> The DUB package registry [1] has finally gained support for the text and category based search of packages.

Is it possible to add a feature to sort the view by the added date of a package (rather than just updated/name sorting)? Sometimes I'd like to see which packages are new in the registry.