March 10, 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4085



--- Comment #12 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2014-03-10 01:22:14 PDT ---
This suggests the introduction of a static foreach, so the current ER is not
needed:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP57

So I think the static foreach part of this proposal could be considered closed and replaced by the DIP.

Something like Iota is still needed because static foreach doesn't replace fully the foreach on tuples and you static foreach(0 .. n) can't use a "step" value anyway.

On the other hand in the pull requests staticIota was replaces by a toTypeTuple (https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1472  but I don't know its current static) so eventually this whole issue could be closed.

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------