http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.zip
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.dmg
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.i386.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_i386.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-i386.pkg.tar.xz
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz

There is always something I broke or overlooked, so let's not make an announcement yet until this is good to go. The web site needs updating, too.

On 2013-11-04 09:03, Walter Bright wrote:
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.dmg
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_amd64.deb
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.i386.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_i386.deb
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-i386.pkg.tar.xz
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
>
> There is always something I broke or overlooked, so let's not make an
> announcement yet until this is good to go. The web site needs updating,
> too.

Still no dmd.conf or 64bit binaries for FreeBSD.

Based on the time you sent this I'm guessing you failed to include my recent pull requests for the documentation which Kenji merged, see:

http://forum.dlang.org/thread/CAFDvkctqW-QDsGLA+Y6z67O686J1W0si2ZeBBF=B05arMwnLTQ@mail.gmail.com

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

On 2013-11-04 09:03, Walter Bright wrote:
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.dmg
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_amd64.deb
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.i386.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_i386.deb
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-i386.pkg.tar.xz
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
>
> There is always something I broke or overlooked, so let's not make an
> announcement yet until this is good to go. The web site needs updating,
> too.

You might want to name the release candidates properly and uniquely, just as you started to do with the betas.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

On Monday, 4 November 2013 at 08:35:26 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-11-04 09:03, Walter Bright wrote:
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.zip
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.dmg
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_amd64.deb
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.i386.rpm
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_i386.deb
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-i386.pkg.tar.xz
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz

Another 5 months waiting?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11365

On 2013-11-04 09:03, Walter Bright wrote:
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.dmg
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_amd64.deb
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.i386.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_i386.deb
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-i386.pkg.tar.xz
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
>
> There is always something I broke or overlooked, so let's not make an
> announcement yet until this is good to go. The web site needs updating,
> too.

dmd.2.064.dmg and dmd-2.064-0-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz are missing. The naming scheme is inconsistent. I don't know if they follow a platform specific naming scheme.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

On Monday, 4 November 2013 at 08:03:55 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.dmg
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_amd64.deb
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.i386.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_i386.deb
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-i386.pkg.tar.xz
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
>
> There is always something I broke or overlooked, so let's not make an announcement yet until this is good to go. The web site needs updating, too.

I still have a closure bug. Dustmite is running on it right now.

On Monday, 4 November 2013 at 08:03:55 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.dmg
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_amd64.deb
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.i386.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064-0_i386.deb
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-i386.pkg.tar.xz
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064-0-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
>
> There is always something I broke or overlooked, so let's not make an announcement yet until this is good to go. The web site needs updating, too.

FreeBSD libphobos2.a not updated in 2.064 betas (and now in the release candidate, too):
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11413

I don't have a FreeBSD system to test whether anything actually works, but a 23M half-year-old standard library file in the zip-archive looks just plain wrong.  No library updates since February?..

On 11/4/2013 12:42 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> dmd.2.064.dmg

There now.

> and dmd-2.064-0-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz are missing.

Seems to no longer be in 2.064. The installer builder was changed.

> The naming scheme is inconsistent. I don't know if they follow a platform specific naming scheme.

They don't, but they've followed this pattern since they were originally created by Jordi, and I've left it as is.

On 11/4/2013 12:34 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> Based on the time you sent this I'm guessing you failed to include my recent
> pull requests for the documentation which Kenji merged, see:
>
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/CAFDvkctqW-QDsGLA+Y6z67O686J1W0si2ZeBBF=B05arMwnLTQ@mail.gmail.com

Kenji merged them after I started building the RC. I'll put them in the next RC.

On 11/4/2013 12:35 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> You might want to name the release candidates properly and uniquely, just as you
> started to do with the betas.

It'll follow the 2.063 pattern.