December 13, 2015 Voting For std.experimental.ndslice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to Phobos, std.experimental.ndslice, should be accepted. To vote, please respond to this post. You have three options: * Yes * Yes with a single condition * No If you vote "yes" you can still mention something you'd like improved, but please be explicit if that problem is a non starter for you and you are choosing option two. If you vote no, please state why, though you aren't required to. Everyone can vote, but the contributors to the language will have more sway. If you are a contributor, please identify yourself as such. Some things to consider when making a vote: * Is this functionality needed in Phobos? * The API is practically permanent once the module is accepted. Some minor changes can be made, but a full redesign is no longer an option. The voting will end December 27th. Github: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3397 dub: http://code.dlang.org/packages/dip80-ndslice docs: http://dtest.thecybershadow.net/artifact/website-13cbdcf17d84fc31328c3f517a56bea783c418d6-dd2292a424959b594956eeeba64d391f/web/phobos-prerelease/std_experimental_ndslice.html/ original discussion: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/rilfmeaqkailgpxoziuo@forum.dlang.org review thread: http://forum.dlang.org/post/uesnmkgniumswfclwbgt@forum.dlang.org |
December 13, 2015 Re: Voting For std.experimental.ndslice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jack Stouffer | On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 05:10:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to Phobos, std.experimental.ndslice, should be accepted.
>
> To vote, please respond to this post. You have three options:
>
> * Yes
> * Yes with a single condition
> * No
I vote yes. I am a contributor to Phobos.
|
December 13, 2015 Re: Voting For std.experimental.ndslice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jack Stouffer | On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 05:10:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote: > This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to Phobos, std.experimental.ndslice, should be accepted. > > [...] Docs fixed link: http://dtest.thecybershadow.net/artifact/website-13cbdcf17d84fc31328c3f517a56bea783c418d6-dd2292a424959b594956eeeba64d391f/web/phobos-prerelease/std_experimental_ndslice.html The latest docs always can be found at PullRequest's CyberShadow/DAutoTest |
December 13, 2015 Re: Voting For std.experimental.ndslice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jack Stouffer | On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 05:10:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> * The API is practically permanent once the module is accepted. Some minor changes can be made, but a full redesign is no longer an option.
Is std.experimental also on the table, or directly to phobos?
|
December 13, 2015 Re: Voting For std.experimental.ndslice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jack Stouffer | On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 05:10:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to Phobos, std.experimental.ndslice, should be accepted.
>
> [...]
Yes
|
December 13, 2015 Re: Voting For std.experimental.ndslice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to lobo | 13.12.2015 12:01, lobo пишет:
> On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 05:10:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
>> This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to
>> Phobos, std.experimental.ndslice, should be accepted.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Yes
Yes
|
December 13, 2015 Re: Voting For std.experimental.ndslice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jack Stouffer | On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 05:10:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to Phobos, std.experimental.ndslice, should be accepted.
>
> To vote, please respond to this post.
Yes
|
December 13, 2015 Re: Voting For std.experimental.ndslice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jack Stouffer | On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 05:10:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to Phobos, std.experimental.ndslice, should be accepted.
>
> [...]
Yes.
|
December 13, 2015 Re: Voting For std.experimental.ndslice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Meta | On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 06:07:15 UTC, Meta wrote:
> Is std.experimental also on the table, or directly to phobos?
Not quite sure what you're asking here, but if you're asking if this is going into stdx first, then the answer is yes. Things that go into stdx aren't supposed to change that much.
|
December 13, 2015 Re: Voting For std.experimental.ndslice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jack Stouffer | On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 05:10:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to Phobos, std.experimental.ndslice, should be accepted.
>
> [...]
I've played some large part in the various iterations of reviewing this, so I'm biased, but of course:
yes
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation