On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:09:33 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> wrong version, this is my letest version: https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQikdhKiAywgBpKwANFR

Thank you!
Updated.

BTW: I have changed dub.json a little too:

{
    "name": "vibedtest",
    "targetName": "vibedtest",
    "targetType": "executable",
    "targetPath": "bin",
    "dependencies": {
        "vibe-d": "~>0.8.2-alpha.1"
    },
    "subConfigurations": {"vibe-d": "libevent"},
    "versions": [
        "VibeManualMemoryManagement"
    ],
    "buildTypes": {
        "release": { "buildOptions": ["releaseMode", "optimize", "inline"],
                     "dflags-posix-ldc": ["-flto=thin",
"-Xcc=-fuse-ld=gold"] }
    }
}

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:09:33 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>
>> wrong version, this is my letest version: https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQi kdhKiAywgBpKwANFR
>>
>
> Thank you!
> Updated.
>

And it seems it is faster with GC. So removing VibeManualMemoryManagement helped in some cases too.

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11@gmail.com> wrote:

> BTW: I have changed dub.json a little too:
>
> {
>     "name": "vibedtest",
>     "targetName": "vibedtest",
>     "targetType": "executable",
>     "targetPath": "bin",
>     "dependencies": {
>         "vibe-d": "~>0.8.2-alpha.1"
>     },
>     "subConfigurations": {"vibe-d": "libevent"},
>     "versions": [
>         "VibeManualMemoryManagement"
>     ],
>     "buildTypes": {
>         "release": { "buildOptions": ["releaseMode", "optimize", "inline"],
>                      "dflags-posix-ldc": ["-flto=thin",
> "-Xcc=-fuse-ld=gold"] }
>     }
> }
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:09:33 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>
>>> wrong version, this is my letest version: https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQi kdhKiAywgBpKwANFR
>>>
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Updated.
>>
>
>

Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without VibeManualMemoryManagement

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11@gmail.com> wrote:

> And it seems it is faster with GC. So removing VibeManualMemoryManagement helped in some cases too.
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> BTW: I have changed dub.json a little too:
>>
>> {
>>     "name": "vibedtest",
>>     "targetName": "vibedtest",
>>     "targetType": "executable",
>>     "targetPath": "bin",
>>     "dependencies": {
>>         "vibe-d": "~>0.8.2-alpha.1"
>>     },
>>     "subConfigurations": {"vibe-d": "libevent"},
>>     "versions": [
>>         "VibeManualMemoryManagement"
>>     ],
>>     "buildTypes": {
>>         "release": { "buildOptions": ["releaseMode", "optimize",
>> "inline"],
>>                      "dflags-posix-ldc": ["-flto=thin",
>> "-Xcc=-fuse-ld=gold"] }
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:09:33 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>>
>>>> wrong version, this is my letest version: https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQikdhKiAywgBpKwANFR
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>> Updated.
>>>
>>
>>
>

s'/sema/same/

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without VibeManualMemoryManagement
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And it seems it is faster with GC. So removing VibeManualMemoryManagement helped in some cases too.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW: I have changed dub.json a little too:
>>>
>>> {
>>>     "name": "vibedtest",
>>>     "targetName": "vibedtest",
>>>     "targetType": "executable",
>>>     "targetPath": "bin",
>>>     "dependencies": {
>>>         "vibe-d": "~>0.8.2-alpha.1"
>>>     },
>>>     "subConfigurations": {"vibe-d": "libevent"},
>>>     "versions": [
>>>         "VibeManualMemoryManagement"
>>>     ],
>>>     "buildTypes": {
>>>         "release": { "buildOptions": ["releaseMode", "optimize",
>>> "inline"],
>>>                      "dflags-posix-ldc": ["-flto=thin",
>>> "-Xcc=-fuse-ld=gold"] }
>>>     }
>>> }
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:09:33 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> wrong version, this is my letest version: https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQikdhKiAywgBpKwANFR
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>> Updated.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:46:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without VibeManualMemoryManagement

Do you see any benefits from using LDC instead of DMD?

with dmd 26K - 28K
witlh ldc 27K - 29K

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:46:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>
>> Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without VibeManualMemoryManagement
>>
>
> Do you see any benefits from using LDC instead of DMD?
>

Other implementations use switch. https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/406dafbedbd9 is it slower?

in this situation I dont thing there will be difference

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Kagamin via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:

> Other implementations use switch. https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/406dafbedbd9 is it slower?
>

Ok, maybe there is a some small improvments, but it is nothing what would make this faster than rust and still undere 30K on my pc

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11@gmail.com> wrote:

> in this situation I dont thing there will be difference
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Kagamin via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> Other implementations use switch. https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/406dafbedbd9 is it slower?
>>
>
>