March 08, 2015 Documentation confusion | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hi, I just want to be sure that I'm not missing something, as I'm a bit confused: 1. The docs at http://dlang.org/phobos/ are not complete, right? Even not complete in that all runtime / phobos modules are listed with a comment "no docs yet". I'm missing stuff like: import std.c.windows.windows; import core.sys.windows.dll; 2. The fallback for 1. is to read the code? Or are there are any further documentation areas I don't know about? 3. Then there is http://wiki.dlang.org which is the new wiki for http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d , right? Was all content moved / copied to the new wiki? And the old wiki is read-only now? Why not just use a redirection then? -- Robert M. Münch http://www.saphirion.com smarter | better | faster |
March 08, 2015 Re: Documentation confusion | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Robert M. Münch | On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Robert M. Münch via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > Hi, I just want to be sure that I'm not missing something, as I'm a bit confused: > > 1. The docs at http://dlang.org/phobos/ are not complete, right? Even not complete in that all runtime / phobos modules are listed with a comment "no docs yet". I'm missing stuff like: > > import std.c.windows.windows; > import core.sys.windows.dll; This is a defect in the documentation. Please file an issue at http://issues.dlang.org/. [...] > 3. Then there is http://wiki.dlang.org which is the new wiki for http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d , right? Was all content moved / copied to the new wiki? And the old wiki is read-only now? Why not just use a redirection then? [...] I don't know the reason it's not just a redirection, but wiki.dlang.org is now the official wiki. T -- If you compete with slaves, you become a slave. -- Norbert Wiener |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation