Thread overview
Re: LDC and Debian
May 08, 2013
H. S. Teoh
May 08, 2013
Iain Buclaw
May 08, 2013
Iain Buclaw
May 08, 2013
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:39:16AM +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> The Debian Freeze is over now that Wheezy is released, and stuff is now filtering its way into Unstable making the use of Experimental more as it should be.
> 
> Now would be a good time to get a new LDC into Debian.

And GDC too!


> I can't actually do anything constructive to help though other than confirm that master/HEAD works fine for me built on my Debian Unstable machines with the submodules fully up to date.
[...]

I can help sponsor GDC uploads if necessary. I may try to build it myself, but I'm not sure if I have the time (or patience!) to babysit through it (past experiences of building GCC/GDC were not that pleasant, sad to say).


T

-- 
Two wrongs don't make a right; but three rights do make a left...
May 08, 2013
On 05/08/2013 04:53 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> I can help sponsor GDC uploads if necessary. I may try to build it myself, but I'm not sure if I have the time (or patience!) to babysit through it (past experiences of building GCC/GDC were not that pleasant, sad to say).

Does Debian unstable/experimental now have GCC 4.8 by default?  (I only ever use its prodigal downstream:-)

The reason I ask is because my successful build strategy used gcc-snapshot, and the instructions on there are quite specific NEVER to use that as a basis for building Debian packages.

Could either of you give me a ssh login on an appropriate Debian box with gcc build dependencies already installed?  Then I could have a go at building GDC and if successful, we could use this as the basis for a new package.

Of course, I can install Debian Experimental in VirtualBox, but if either of you have a box already set up that you'd be happy to give me access to it might speed things up.
May 08, 2013
On 8 May 2013 15:53, H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx> wrote:

> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:39:16AM +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> > The Debian Freeze is over now that Wheezy is released, and stuff is now filtering its way into Unstable making the use of Experimental more as it should be.
> >
> > Now would be a good time to get a new LDC into Debian.
>
> And GDC too!
>
>
> > I can't actually do anything constructive to help though other than confirm that master/HEAD works fine for me built on my Debian Unstable machines with the submodules fully up to date.
> [...]
>
> I can help sponsor GDC uploads if necessary. I may try to build it myself, but I'm not sure if I have the time (or patience!) to babysit through it (past experiences of building GCC/GDC were not that pleasant, sad to say).
>
>
Matthias (aka doko) already does that.  I need to resend him the orig.tar.gz - a blocker is the documentation has invariants in the license.  This needs removing...


-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';


May 08, 2013
On 8 May 2013 16:04, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakeling@webdrake.net>wrote:

> On 05/08/2013 04:53 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > I can help sponsor GDC uploads if necessary. I may try to build it myself, but I'm not sure if I have the time (or patience!) to babysit through it (past experiences of building GCC/GDC were not that pleasant, sad to say).
>
> Does Debian unstable/experimental now have GCC 4.8 by default?  (I only
> ever use
> its prodigal downstream:-)
>
> The reason I ask is because my successful build strategy used
> gcc-snapshot, and
> the instructions on there are quite specific NEVER to use that as a basis
> for
> building Debian packages.
>
> Could either of you give me a ssh login on an appropriate Debian box with
> gcc
> build dependencies already installed?  Then I could have a go at building
> GDC
> and if successful, we could use this as the basis for a new package.
>
> Of course, I can install Debian Experimental in VirtualBox, but if either
> of you
> have a box already set up that you'd be happy to give me access to it might
> speed things up.
>

I've already done this... see previous email for outstanding things to do. :-)

-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';


May 08, 2013
On 05/08/2013 05:10 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> I've already done this... see previous email for outstanding things to do. :-)

You mean already sent a package?  That's great news, thank you! :-)