On 14 September 2013 00:34, John Colvin <john.loughran.colvin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 23:03:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> On 13 September 2013 22:18, John Colvin <john.loughran.colvin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 16:27:11 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 13, 2013 9:53 AM, "Russel Winder" <russel@winder.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 14:56 +0200, Sönke Ludwig wrote: […]
>>>>> > Regarding the dub music genre, it has to be said that > > although it
>>>>> > is
>>>>> > the
>>>>> > root for dubstep and in turn ... brostep, it's usually not
>>>>> > > really
>>>>> > comparable result-wise and I have a strong desire to avoid
>>>>> > > putting
>>>>> > the
>>>>> > word "step" somewhere in proximity of "DUB" ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps this is the last word on the dubstep issue :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.mazbox.com/synths/dubstep/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Someone should port to D.  In fact that's one thing I'd definitely would
>>>> like to start a case for - using D in audio processing (eg: effects,
>>>> synths
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Me too. Unfortunately the whole pro-audio plugin industry is completely wrapped around steinbergs little finger, doing everything as VSTs in c++.
>>
>>
>> Perhaps you haven't heard of LV2? http://lv2plug.in/
>
>
> It looks OK, but VST has an almost complete stranglehold (with the exception of AU on OS-X I suppose). Linux and open source have really failed to make much of an impact in the world of audio. Almost all the pros are on OSX/Windows with £500+ DAWs* and thousands of pounds of closed source VST plugins. A large proportion of free VSTs aren't even open source.
>
> *The notable exception being Reaper, which is very affordable and quite widely used these days.

I've been considering getting energyXT in recent days...

http://www.energy-xt.com/index.php?id=0101


-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';

Am 14.09.2013 01:03, schrieb Iain Buclaw:
> On 13 September 2013 22:18, John Colvin <john.loughran.colvin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 16:27:11 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 13, 2013 9:53 AM, "Russel Winder" <russel@winder.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 14:56 +0200, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>>>> […]
>>>>> Regarding the dub music genre, it has to be said that > although it is
>>>>> the
>>>>> root for dubstep and in turn ... brostep, it's usually not > really
>>>>> comparable result-wise and I have a strong desire to avoid > putting
>>>>> the
>>>>> word "step" somewhere in proximity of "DUB" ;)
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps this is the last word on the dubstep issue :-)
>>>>
>>>> http://www.mazbox.com/synths/dubstep/
>>>>
>>>
>>> Someone should port to D.  In fact that's one thing I'd definitely would
>>> like to start a case for - using D in audio processing (eg: effects,
>>> synths
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Me too. Unfortunately the whole pro-audio plugin industry is completely
>> wrapped around steinbergs little finger, doing everything as VSTs in c++.
>
> Perhaps you haven't heard of LV2? http://lv2plug.in/
>
>
>

Or Overtone

http://overtone.github.io/