On 2014-05-29 03:29, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:

> 1. The order of the dimensions of multi-dimensional static arrays is backwards
> in comparison to what most everyone expects.
>
>      int[4][5][6] foo;
>
> is the same as
>
>      int foo[6][5][4];
>
> and has the same dimensions as
>
>      auto bar = new int[][][](6, 5, 4);


IMO, it's the dynamic array creation syntax that's weird here. The static array syntax is sensible, easy to explain, and consistent with reading the type left to right. I've never used the syntax for creating a multidimensional dynamic array, so I was frankly surprised to see it worked that way.

--
  Simen