I'm guessing the following is an accepts-invalid bug:

void test(int) {}
void main() { test = 4; }

Anyway, if/when the above stops being legal I'd be nice if I could create property functions using aliases. Something like this:

struct Bar
{
    int getFoo() { return 0; }
    void setFoo(int i) { }

    @property alias getFoo foo;
    @property alias setFoo foo;
}

void main()
{
    Bar bar;
    bar.foo = 4;
}

I'm not sure if this is *actually* making "foo" a property right now or if DMD completely ignores the property keyword there, it's hard to tell since regular functions already act as properties.

But do you think this code should be legal and maybe create properties like that? It sure looks handy (admittedly it's not a to-die-for feature, just a convenience when porting code).