Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 21, 2016 [Issue 16190] to!string on enum should be fully qualified for consistency | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16190 b2.temp@gmx.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |b2.temp@gmx.com Hardware|x86 |All OS|Mac OS X |All --- Comment #1 from b2.temp@gmx.com --- I think that any fix directly in to() can break a lot of code because currently to!string and to!E work together. I'm sure that it's already used as it is now by many people. The fix, if any, should maintain the old behvior and allow to get the identifier when explicitly needed, for example: auto toImpl(T, S, bool fq = false)(auto ref E e) if (is(S == enum) && is(T==string)) {} with "fq" a CT bool that indicates if the output includes the "enum identifier". "Fully qualified" would mean that even the module name would be included so I suppose that what you want is actually the enum identifier. ---- By the way why do you report this as a dmd (and not phobos) issue ? -- |
June 21, 2016 [Issue 16190] to!string on enum should be fully qualified for consistency | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16190 Timothee Cour <timothee.cour2@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |timothee.cour2@gmail.com Component|dmd |phobos -- |
March 21, 2020 [Issue 16190] to!string on enum should be fully qualified for consistency | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16190 Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|b2.temp@gmx.com | -- |
December 17, 2022 [Issue 16190] to!string on enum should be fully qualified for consistency | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16190 Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P1 |P2 -- |
December 01 [Issue 16190] to!string on enum should be fully qualified for consistency | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16190 --- Comment #2 from dlangBugzillaToGithub <robert.schadek@posteo.de> --- THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB https://github.com/dlang/phobos/issues/10185 DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation