https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21650

--- Comment #1 from adela.vais99@gmail.com ---
The order you suggested would have introduced breaking changes. See a thread here [1].

[1] https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/7642#discussion_r493478675

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21650

--- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy@gmail.com> ---
I don't think having both overloads would break any code. Types don't match values, values don't match types.

parse(Target, Source, Flag!"doCount" doCount)(Source rng) will match existing
uses that specify the source range type explicitly

parse(Target, Flag!"doCount" doCount, Source)(Source rng) will match new uses
that want to use IFTI to detect the Source range type.

What was discussed in that thread is inserting the flag in *existing* functions. I'm talking about adding overloads to address the new usage.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21650

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P1                          |P4

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21650

--- Comment #3 from dlangBugzillaToGithub <robert.schadek@posteo.de> ---
THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/issues/10457

DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

--