http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220

           Summary: ICE with template and mangleof
           Product: D
           Version: 0.160
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P4
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla@digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: clugdbug@yahoo.com.au


Assertion failure: 'deco' on line 536 in file 'mtype.c'
Tested with DMD-Windows 0.160 and 0.161.
Very easy workaround (just add parentheses).
---
template echidna(char[] str)
{
    const int echidna = 1;
}

// Must be 'typedef', can be any function or delegate
typedef int function (int) platypus;

// If you uncomment this next line, _both_ asserts will compile!
//static assert( echidna!((platypus).mangleof) == 1);

static assert( echidna!(platypus.mangleof) == 1);


-- 

d-bugmail@puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-06-23:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220

> Assertion failure: 'deco' on line 536 in file 'mtype.c'
> Tested with DMD-Windows 0.160 and 0.161.
> Very easy workaround (just add parentheses).
> ---
> template echidna(char[] str)
> {
>     const int echidna = 1;
> }
>
> // Must be 'typedef', can be any function or delegate
> typedef int function (int) platypus;
>
> // If you uncomment this next line, _both_ asserts will compile!
> //static assert( echidna!((platypus).mangleof) == 1);
>
> static assert( echidna!(platypus.mangleof) == 1);

Added to DStress as http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_A.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_B.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_C.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_D.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_E.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_F.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_G.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/m/mangelof_16_H.d

Thomas

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220


clugdbug@yahoo.com.au changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #1 from clugdbug@yahoo.com.au  2006-08-24 07:58 -------
This appears to have been sliently fixed - at least in works in DMD 0.165
Windows.
Probably should be in DStress, though, in case it reappears.


-- 

d-bugmail@puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-08-24:

> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220
> This appears to have been sliently fixed - at least in works in DMD 0.165
> Windows.
> Probably should be in DStress, though, in case it reappears.

Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news group?

news:0nocn3-d58.ln1@birke.kuehne.cn http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-bugs/2006-June/001392.html

Thomas

Thomas Kuehne wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> d-bugmail@puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-08-24:
> 
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220
>> This appears to have been sliently fixed - at least in works in DMD 0.165
>> Windows.
>> Probably should be in DStress, though, in case it reappears.
> 
> Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news
> group?
> 

It used to do so. I reported this as issue 243. Not sure anyone responsible noticed though.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=243

/Oskar

Oskar Linde wrote:
> Thomas Kuehne wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> d-bugmail@puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-08-24:
>>
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=220
>>> This appears to have been sliently fixed - at least in works in DMD 0.165
>>> Windows.
>>> Probably should be in DStress, though, in case it reappears.
>>
>> Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news
>> group?
>>
> 
> It used to do so. I reported this as issue 243. Not sure anyone responsible noticed though.
> 
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=243
> 
> /Oskar

It does, but only if the message comes from someone with a registered email address.  If the address doesn't exist, the msg isn't captured.

Later,
Brad

Brad Roberts schrieb am 2006-08-24:
> Oskar Linde wrote:
>> Thomas Kuehne wrote:

>>> Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news group?
>>>
>> 
>> It used to do so. I reported this as issue 243. Not sure anyone responsible noticed though.
>> 
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=243

> It does, but only if the message comes from someone with a registered email address.  If the address doesn't exist, the msg isn't captured.

Header extract from the message under investigation:

> Message-ID: <0nocn3-d58.ln1@birke.kuehne.cn>
> From: Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop@kuehne.cn>
> Newsgroups: digitalmars.D.bugs
> Subject: Re: [Issue 220] New: ICE with template and mangleof
> References: <bug-220-3@http.d.puremagic.com/issues/>

When I file a new bug report, buzilla uses the same address as above for the "ReportedBy" field.

Thomas

Thomas Kuehne wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Brad Roberts schrieb am 2006-08-24:
>> Oskar Linde wrote:
>>> Thomas Kuehne wrote:
> 
>>>> Strange, I thougth bugzilla integrated messages posted in the news
>>>> group?
>>>>
>>> It used to do so. I reported this as issue 243. Not sure anyone responsible noticed though.
>>>
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=243
> 
>> It does, but only if the message comes from someone with a registered email address.  If the address doesn't exist, the msg isn't captured.
> 
> Header extract from the message under investigation:
> 
>> Message-ID: <0nocn3-d58.ln1@birke.kuehne.cn>
>> From: Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop@kuehne.cn>
>> Newsgroups: digitalmars.D.bugs
>> Subject: Re: [Issue 220] New: ICE with template and mangleof
>> References: <bug-220-3@http.d.puremagic.com/issues/>
> 
> When I file a new bug report, buzilla uses the same address as above for
> the "ReportedBy" field.
> 
> Thomas
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> iD8DBQFE7hxSLK5blCcjpWoRAjQ6AJ4q2EwOFLMGKhtNgdhWFHSXA04QgwCffcFv
> /xddd+Ji6PeX8Vngz6LM9O8=
> =s4K4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

(subject changed to stop polluting bugzilla with this thread)

Take a look at issue #220 and notice all the comments from you and me. It's definitely working.  What am I missing?

Later,
Brad

Brad Roberts schrieb am 2006-08-25:
> Thomas Kuehne wrote:

>> Header extract from the message under investigation:
>> 
>>> Message-ID: <0nocn3-d58.ln1@birke.kuehne.cn>
>>> From: Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop@kuehne.cn>
>>> Newsgroups: digitalmars.D.bugs
>>> Subject: Re: [Issue 220] New: ICE with template and mangleof
>>> References: <bug-220-3@http.d.puremagic.com/issues/>

> Take a look at issue #220 and notice all the comments from you and me. It's definitely working.  What am I missing?

I don't see the text of 0nocn3-d58.ln1@birke.kuehne.cn (see above) in bugzilla. A copy of the message was received by puremagic.com: http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-bugs/2006-June/001392.html

Thomas

Thomas Kuehne wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Brad Roberts schrieb am 2006-08-25:
>> Thomas Kuehne wrote:
> 
>>> Header extract from the message under investigation:
>>>
>>>> Message-ID: <0nocn3-d58.ln1@birke.kuehne.cn>
>>>> From: Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop@kuehne.cn>
>>>> Newsgroups: digitalmars.D.bugs
>>>> Subject: Re: [Issue 220] New: ICE with template and mangleof
>>>> References: <bug-220-3@http.d.puremagic.com/issues/>
> 
>> Take a look at issue #220 and notice all the comments from you and me. It's definitely working.  What am I missing?
> 
> I don't see the text of 0nocn3-d58.ln1@birke.kuehne.cn (see above) in
> bugzilla. A copy of the message was received by puremagic.com:
> http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-bugs/2006-June/001392.html
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> iD8DBQFE7rmfLK5blCcjpWoRAheiAJ9Tn1Wca5nxfKdT/QBuaKVBCGmeiACfZyvR
> TE1XiMzE4fRKyL3snuWdwko=
> =5qIH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Ok.. that'd be because that message came in while the regexp for matching subjects was still looking only at \[Bug \d+\] instead of \[(Bug|Issue) \d+\].  The regexp was fixed on July 12th and had been broken since approx June 11th.  I did not attempt to re-capture messages from that span of time.  Yours are arguably of high enough value to want to try to do that, or at least do that for the dstress additions.  I'll add that to my todo list for this weekend.

Later,
Brad