On 8/8/11, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I like this idea.  I think it belongs in phobos somewhere, if not already.
>
> -Steve
>

Allow me to +1 on that, I've had a need for this (but now I can't
remember why, hah!).

> Sorry, wasn't me...

Oops, sorry.

> I like this idea.  I think it belongs in phobos somewhere, if not already.

I remember getting the idea in one of the articles written to win an iPad2 a few months ago.



Philippe

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 01:34:34 -0400, Philippe Sigaud <philippe.sigaud@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Sorry, wasn't me...
>
> Oops, sorry.
>
>> I like this idea.  I think it belongs in phobos somewhere, if not already.
>
> I remember getting the idea in one of the articles written to win an
> iPad2 a few months ago.

Maybe Nick's (something about efficiency vs. flexibility?), mine was about array appending, David's and Robert's were about concurrency/parallelism, and Jonathan's was about migrating to std.datetime from std.date.

There were also a couple that were suggested but did not officially enter, could have been one of those?

-Steve

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 17:43, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Maybe Nick's (something about efficiency vs. flexibility?), mine was about array appending, David's and Robert's were about concurrency/parallelism, and Jonathan's was about migrating to std.datetime from std.date.

Yes, that was Nick's:

[5] Have Your Efficiency, and Flexibility Too by Nick SAbalausky http://www.semitwist.com/articles/EfficientAndFlexible/SinglePage/#part6-3

(Converting a Runtime Value to Compile-Time)