On 3/7/11, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> wrote:
>

Kidding, just kidding..

On Sunday 06 March 2011 18:33:04 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 3/7/11, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Kidding, just kidding..

That _did_ seem like a rather rude post for you...

- Jonathan M Davis

On 03/07/2011 03:22 AM, Peter Lundgren wrote:
> == Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisProg@gmx.com)'s article
>> On Sunday 06 March 2011 14:05:04 Peter Lundgren wrote:
>>> Can you define an associative array in a way that can be evaluated at
>>> compile time like you can with non-associative arrays?
>> I'm pretty sure not. I think that it's currently suffering the same fate as stuff
>> like classes and is not yet able to be CTFEed. Some day...
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> If not, then what is the D way to initialize a static field of a struct or class a
> la Java's static initializer blocks? I don't mind constructing the associative
> array at run-time if I have to, but I can't afford to do it more than the once needed.

Use the module's <static this () {...}> clause:

int[string] aa;
static this () { aa = ["a":1, "b":2, "c":3]; }

unittest {
    foreach (k,v ; aa)
        writefln("%s --> %s", k,v);
}

Note: you can have as many such ckauses as you like.

Denis
-- 
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com

On 3/7/11, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 06 March 2011 18:33:04 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>> On 3/7/11, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Kidding, just kidding..
>
> That _did_ seem like a rather rude post for you...
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
>

Don't worry, I'd never be rude to my fellow D programmers out of the
blue. Maybe that post was a semi-rant, but only half-serious. :)
Anyway there's a nice SO post on enums here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4790652/enum-vs-immutable-in-d/4793684#4793684