Thread overview | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
October 20, 2013 Re: LDC 0.12.0 beta 1 released, please help test! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Any further regression reports? If not, I'd propose to release 0.12.0 tomorrow. I already have a branch for 2.064 in the works, so hopefully the next release won't be too far out anyway. David |
October 20, 2013 Re: LDC 0.12.0 beta 1 released, please help test! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Nadlinger | On 20.10.2013 21:58, David Nadlinger wrote: > Any further regression reports? If not, I'd propose to release 0.12.0 tomorrow. Not sure if it is a regression, but I've just noticed __VERSION__ is defined as 63, but it was 2062 in 0.11 and it's 2063 in dmd). -- mk |
October 20, 2013 Re: LDC 0.12.0 beta 1 released, please help test! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Martin Krejcirik | On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Martin Krejcirik <mk-junk@i-line.cz> wrote:
> Not sure if it is a regression, but I've just noticed __VERSION__ is defined as 63, but it was 2062 in 0.11 and it's 2063 in dmd).
It is, fix incoming.
David
|
October 20, 2013 Re: LDC 0.12.0 beta 1 released, please help test! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Nadlinger | I think I found a regression. It seems that ldmd2 is not building 64-bit applications by default on a 64-bit machine while it did before. Although ldc2 does it correctly. Of course, specifiying -m64 makes it work correctly.
On Sunday, 20 October 2013 at 19:58:35 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> Any further regression reports? If not, I'd propose to release 0.12.0 tomorrow.
>
> I already have a branch for 2.064 in the works, so hopefully the next
> release won't be too far out anyway.
>
> David
|
October 20, 2013 Re: LDC 0.12.0 beta 1 released, please help test! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to yaz | On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:58 PM, yaz <yazan.dabain@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I found a regression. It seems that ldmd2 is not building 64-bit applications by default on a 64-bit machine while it did before. Although ldc2 does it correctly. Of course, specifiying -m64 makes it work correctly.
LDMD is not supposed to add any -m* flags by default.
What platform are you on? Do you use a binary package? Which one? Could you please post the output of "ldmd2 -vdmd helloworld.d" (i.e. the LDC command LDMD actually runs)?
David
|
October 21, 2013 Re: LDC 0.12.0 beta 1 released, please help test! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Martin Krejcirik | On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Martin Krejcirik <mk-junk@i-line.cz> wrote: > Not sure if it is a regression, but I've just noticed __VERSION__ is defined as 63, but it was 2062 in 0.11 and it's 2063 in dmd). Resolved in Git master: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/pull/516 David |
October 21, 2013 Re: LDC 0.12.0 beta 1 released, please help test! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Nadlinger | On Sunday, 20 October 2013 at 22:11:25 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:58 PM, yaz <yazan.dabain@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think I found a regression. It seems that ldmd2 is not building 64-bit >> applications by default on a 64-bit machine while it did before. Although >> ldc2 does it correctly. Of course, specifiying -m64 makes it work correctly. > > LDMD is not supposed to add any -m* flags by default. > > What platform are you on? Do you use a binary package? Which one? > Could you please post the output of "ldmd2 -vdmd helloworld.d" (i.e. > the LDC command LDMD actually runs)? > > David Sorry for the late reply, here's what I get: /home/userx/apps/ldc2-0.12.0-beta1-linux-x86_64/bin/ldc2 -singleobj -m32 test.d I'm on Fedora 19 x86. |
October 21, 2013 Re: LDC 0.12.0 beta 1 released, please help test! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to yaz | On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:02 AM, yaz <yazan.dabain@gmail.com> wrote: > /home/userx/apps/ldc2-0.12.0-beta1-linux-x86_64/bin/ldc2 -singleobj -m32 test.d I couldn't reproduce the issue on various Ubuntu versions or Arch Linux, but found a possibly related issue in LDMD: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/pull/520 David |
October 21, 2013 Re: LDC 0.12.0 beta 1 released, please help test! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Nadlinger | On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 12:45:00 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:02 AM, yaz <yazan.dabain@gmail.com> wrote:
>> /home/userx/apps/ldc2-0.12.0-beta1-linux-x86_64/bin/ldc2 -singleobj -m32
>> test.d
>
> I couldn't reproduce the issue on various Ubuntu versions or Arch
> Linux, but found a possibly related issue in LDMD:
> https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/pull/520
>
> David
If you want to release another binary, I will happily test.
|
October 22, 2013 Re: LDC 0.12.0 beta 1 released, please help test! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Nadlinger | On Sunday, 20 October 2013 at 19:58:35 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> Any further regression reports? If not, I'd propose to release 0.12.0 tomorrow.
Will you also post an official announcement?
And the source code archive (like in the beta) is missing in the release...
(Sorry for not uploading one - I still rebuild my Gentoo image....)
Kai
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation