GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so far.

So as to not break other projects, the svn code still builds D 1.0 by default.  To build 2.0, run setup-gcc.sh like this:

gcc/d/setup-gcc.sh --d-language-version=2

When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special option.

David

David Friedman wrote:

> GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so far.

Great news! Will need to take a look at 2.0 then :-)

> When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special option.

I thought 1.0 was still the default language version ?

--anders

Anders F Björklund wrote:

> David Friedman wrote:
> 
>> GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so far.
> 
> Great news! Will need to take a look at 2.0 then :-)
> 
>> When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special option.
> 
> I thought 1.0 was still the default language version ?
> 
> --anders

Yes, that would be preferable, 2.0 isn't particularly stable.

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango

Lars Ivar Igesund escribió:
> Anders F Björklund wrote:
> 
>> David Friedman wrote:
>>
>>> GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so
>>> far.
>> Great news! Will need to take a look at 2.0 then :-)
>>
>>> When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source
>>> packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special
>>> option.
>> I thought 1.0 was still the default language version ?
>>
>> --anders
> 
> Yes, that would be preferable, 2.0 isn't particularly stable.
> 

Same here. 1.0, please.

-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal

Carlos Santander wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund escribió:
>> Anders F Björklund wrote:
>>
>>> David Friedman wrote:
>>>
>>>> GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so far.
>>> Great news! Will need to take a look at 2.0 then :-)
>>>
>>>> When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.
>>>> Source
>>>> packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a
>>>> special
>>>> option.
>>> I thought 1.0 was still the default language version ?
>>>
>>> --anders
>>
>> Yes, that would be preferable, 2.0 isn't particularly stable.
>>
> 
> Same here. 1.0, please.
> 
Agreed. What with the recent const changes (see d.D, "Const sucks"), the current DMD 2.0 version is effectively already legacy and any code written with it that takes advantage of constness will have to be rewritten anyway.

1.0, please.
 --downs, who lost his keypair ;_;

On 9/23/07, Carlos Santander <csantander619@gmail.com> wrote:
> Same here. 1.0, please.

Same here aswell...

I'll upload a gdc-4.1/libphobos2 package to Debian experimental, but D 1.0 will stay the default version in Debian testing for now.

Thanks for D 2.0 support. :-)


Arthur.

2007/9/24, Anders Bergh <anders1@gmail.com>:
> On 9/23/07, Carlos Santander <csantander619@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Same here. 1.0, please.
>
> Same here aswell...
>