On 9/15/12, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> wrote:
> So the question is why is const(void)* illegal in D?

Sorry guys this question is entirely wrong. That syntax *is* legal. I don't know what happened last night when it failed to compile, maybe it was template-related. Nuke the question.

On 9/15/12, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/15/12, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So the question is why is const(void)* illegal in D?
>
> Sorry guys this question is entirely wrong. That syntax *is* legal. I don't know what happened last night when it failed to compile, maybe it was template-related. Nuke the question.
>

I know what was causing it now, I had a Const!() template I've used to simulate head-const in D, and the inner type ended up being 'void' which isn't a valid type on its own.