On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a new host.  I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm Seattle time.  The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an hour just to give myself some padding time.
>
> Later,
> Brad
>

And by Murphy's Law, everyone will find about three bugs at that time ;)

Brad Roberts wrote:
> Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a new host.  I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm Seattle time.  The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an hour just to give myself some padding time.
> 
> Later,
> Brad

Ok.. I've changed the dns entry to the new server, so as soon as it propagates around the world, the new site will be active.  I'm sure it's not perfect yet.. but it's good enough to open up.  Please file bug reports against puremagic.com if you find something wrong or missing.  I haven't fully incorporated all of the customizations I'd made to the previous version, but at least the posting to the newsgroups part works again.

Later,
Brad

"Brad Roberts" <braddr@puremagic.com> wrote in message news:mailman.31.1241943078.13405.digitalmars-d-bugs@puremagic.com...
> Brad Roberts wrote:
>> Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it
>> to a new
>> host.  I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm
>> Seattle
>> time.  The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an
>> hour just
>> to give myself some padding time.
>>
>> Later,
>> Brad
>
> Ok.. I've changed the dns entry to the new server, so as soon as it
> propagates
> around the world, the new site will be active.  I'm sure it's not perfect
> yet..
> but it's good enough to open up.  Please file bug reports against
> puremagic.com
> if you find something wrong or missing.  I haven't fully incorporated all
> of the
> customizations I'd made to the previous version, but at least the posting
> to the
> newsgroups part works again.
>
> Later,
> Brad

Whooo, it's very pretty :)

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky <a@a.a> wrote:
>
> Whooo, it's very pretty :)
>

Indeed it is!  Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959

Anyone else notice this?

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky <a@a.a> wrote:
>> Whooo, it's very pretty :)
>>
> 
> Indeed it is!  Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox:
> 
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959
> 
> Anyone else notice this?

It's kind of a mess on Safari.  I'll file a report :-)

Sean Kelly wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky <a@a.a> wrote:
>>> Whooo, it's very pretty :)
>>>
>>
>> Indeed it is!  Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox:
>>
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959
>>
>> Anyone else notice this?
> 
> It's kind of a mess on Safari.  I'll file a report :-)

I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10.

I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files.

Later,
Brad

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky <a@a.a> wrote:
>>
>> Whooo, it's very pretty :)
>>
>
> Indeed it is!  Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959
>
> Anyone else notice this?
>

Yup!

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Sean Kelly wrote:
>> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky <a@a.a> wrote:
>>>> Whooo, it's very pretty :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Indeed it is!  Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox:
>>>
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959
>>>
>>> Anyone else notice this?
>>
>> It's kind of a mess on Safari.  I'll file a report :-)
>
> I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10.
>
> I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files.

You're right, a proper reload fixed it ! :)

>
> Later,
> Brad
>

Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> wrote:
>> Sean Kelly wrote:
>>> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky <a@a.a> wrote:
>>>>> Whooo, it's very pretty :)
>>>>>
>>>> Indeed it is!  Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox:
>>>>
>>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959
>>>>
>>>> Anyone else notice this?
>>> It's kind of a mess on Safari.  I'll file a report :-)
>> I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10.
>>
>> I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files.
> 
> You're right, a proper reload fixed it ! :)

Yup.  Same here.

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10.
>
> I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files.
>
> Later,
> Brad

Oh, nice, that worked!