On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:48:59PM +0200, Maxim Fomin wrote:
> On Friday, 23 August 2013 at 11:30:01 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> >
> >I see Andrei running away !
> 
> So far, this is the best description of current situation regarding allocators.

lol... seriously though, when *are* we going to get working allocators? I mean, right now we don't even have a concrete proposal that we can destroy. And we've been talking about allocators for how many years now?


On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:31:54PM +0200, Brian Rogoff wrote: [...]
> Has anyone tried porting an existing allocator library from C++? Looking over the dconf proceedings, HeapLayers was mentioned as an inspiration for a future D allocators library; would a port make sense?

IIRC, we didn't want to follow C++'s implementation, which in practice is troublesome to use and usually avoided. But what should replace it, isn't all that clear.


> I remember seeing a D2 region allocator, but it appeared to be abandonware.
> 
> Assuming you have a really great allocator library, how would that work with the existing GC requiring features of D? For example, could you have all of your slicing, classes, exceptions, etc. handled by a region allocator?
[...]

I suspect the elusive answers to these questions are what's keeping Andrei on the run. ;-)


T

-- 
Frank disagreement binds closer than feigned agreement.