https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15592

Ivan Kazmenko <gassa@mail.ru> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gassa@mail.ru

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15592

Bastiaan Veelo <Bastiaan@Veelo.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Bastiaan@Veelo.net

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15592

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P1                          |P3

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15592

RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #1 from RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> ---
Specializations have nothing to do with this. The spec clearly states that nested functions cannot be overloaded (point 3 of [1]). This codes compiles:

```
void main(){

    void foo(T : int)() {
    }


    struct S(T : int) {
    }
}
```

It has been argued in the past that this limitation should be lifted, however, Walter opposes it (I don't remember the reason). So closing this as WONTFIX.

[1] https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#nested-declaration-order

--