On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:08:08AM +0200, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Saturday, 24 August 2013 at 03:20:42 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
> >More often than not, the tools submodule (
> >https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools) will not build on
> >git
> >master. So I'm wondering whether it's even being tested before
> >pushing commits.
> 
> In short: no, unfortunately.
[...]

Maybe it should be? It's a relatively small codebase, certainly nothing compared with dmd/druntime/phobos themselves. It wouldn't significantly hurt autotester performance to include it.


T

-- 
Tech-savvy: euphemism for nerdy.

Yes, and it would also help find buggy commits. Actually i'd argue other
popular external d packages should be included in autotester (even if those
wouldnt be blockers)
On Aug 24, 2013 8:35 AM, "H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx> wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:08:08AM +0200, David Nadlinger wrote:
> > On Saturday, 24 August 2013 at 03:20:42 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
> > >More often than not, the tools submodule (
> > >https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools) will not build on
> > >git
> > >master. So I'm wondering whether it's even being tested before
> > >pushing commits.
> >
> > In short: no, unfortunately.
> [...]
>
> Maybe it should be? It's a relatively small codebase, certainly nothing compared with dmd/druntime/phobos themselves. It wouldn't significantly hurt autotester performance to include it.
>
>
> T
>
> --
> Tech-savvy: euphemism for nerdy.
>