https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24333

Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |industry, performance

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24333

Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://issues.dlang.org/sh
                   |                            |ow_bug.cgi?id=24336

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24333

ZombineDev <petar.p.kirov@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petar.p.kirov@gmail.com

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24333

--- Comment #1 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> ---
This is a challenging problem because the ClassInfo is of variable size. Embedding it with the vtbl[] would mean the variable parts would then have to be indirect.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24333

Richard Cattermole <alphaglosined@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |alphaglosined@gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Richard Cattermole <alphaglosined@gmail.com> ---
Not necessarily.

You could reverse ClassInfo members, so that the fixed header goes after the variable length members.

It is the reverse of how you would normally want to work, where you increment the pointer, whereas this would decrement instead.

--