June 21, 2015 type of a variable as a mixin-able string? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Attachments:
| Suppose I have: import std.range; auto a=iota(complex_expr_returning_3()); I'd like to have a function/trait/template/compiler magic that takes variable a and generates a string that can be mixed in to represent the type of a. The difficulty is that typeid(a).to!string doesn't work for Voldermort types: typeid(a).to!string produces "std.range.iota!(int, int).iota.Result", which is not very useful as it can't be mixed in a program, being a voldemort type, eg: mixin("std.range.iota!(int, int).iota.Result a;"); //compile error However, the compiler could help reduce it to something as simple as possible, eg: "typeof(iota(int.init))" here this would work: mixin("typeof(iota(int.init)) a;"); //works Is it possible to do that in a generic way, such that it hides as much as possible the details of the expression (here, "complex_expr_returning_3()" should be simplified to int.init) Or is there another trick I could use to instantiate a variable with same type as a? NOTE: typeof(a) a2; works even though http://www.drdobbs.com/cpp/voldemort-types-in-d/232901591?pgno=2 says it won't work, "Sorry, that won't work, the compiler will not allow a Voldemort Type to be instantiated outside of its scope " (although that's doesn't help with my original problem) |
June 22, 2015 Re: type of a variable as a mixin-able string? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Timothee Cour | On Sunday, 21 June 2015 at 23:25:47 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
> Suppose I have:
>
> import std.range;
> auto a=iota(complex_expr_returning_3());
>
> I'd like to have a function/trait/template/compiler magic that takes
> variable a and generates a string that can be mixed in to represent the
> type of a. The difficulty is that typeid(a).to!string doesn't work for
> Voldermort types:
> typeid(a).to!string produces "std.range.iota!(int, int).iota.Result", which
> is not very useful as it can't be mixed in a program, being a voldemort
> type, eg:
> mixin("std.range.iota!(int, int).iota.Result a;"); //compile error
>
> However, the compiler could help reduce it to something as simple as
> possible, eg:
> "typeof(iota(int.init))"
> here this would work:
>
> mixin("typeof(iota(int.init)) a;"); //works
>
> Is it possible to do that in a generic way, such that it hides as much as
> possible the details of the expression (here, "complex_expr_returning_3()"
> should be simplified to int.init)
>
> Or is there another trick I could use to instantiate a variable with same type as a?
>
>
> NOTE:
> typeof(a) a2;
> works even though
> http://www.drdobbs.com/cpp/voldemort-types-in-d/232901591?pgno=2 says it
> won't work, "Sorry, that won't work, the compiler will not allow a
> Voldemort Type to be instantiated outside of its scope "
> (although that's doesn't help with my original problem)
It's possibly not a real Voldemort type, i.e. one that closes over a local variable and therefore needs a context pointer. DMD correctly rejects this code:
auto foo(int a) {
struct S {
int bar() {
return a;
}
}
return S();
}
void main() {
auto a = foo(42);
typeof(a) b; // Error: cannot access frame pointer of xx.foo.S
}
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation