https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119

Stanislav Blinov <stanislav.blinov@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |stanislav.blinov@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Stanislav Blinov <stanislav.blinov@gmail.com> ---
Error in the original report is trivially worked around by replacing `s = S(0)` with `s = 0` as that is supported by S's constructor.

However, the error comes back as soon as more than one argument gets involved:

struct S
{
    this(int, int) @safe pure nothrow @nogc { }
    ~this() { }
}

struct T
{
    S s;

    this(int) @safe pure nothrow @nogc
    {
        s = S(0, 1); // attribute errors here as this is introducing a dtor
call
    }
}

Two workarounds:

alias AliasSeq(T...) = T;
s = AliasSeq!(0, 1); // works for literals, not for moving stuff

import core.lifetime : forward;
s = forward!args;    // works for moving and copying, but not for literals

Observation about `nothrow` not being looked at is still valid.

Initialization shouldn't require a destructor call, as right hand side should ostensibly be constructed at &s, should it not?

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P1                          |P3

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119

--- Comment #2 from dlangBugzillaToGithub <robert.schadek@posteo.de> ---
THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

https://github.com/dlang/dmd/issues/18849

DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

--