| Thread overview | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
November 12, 2014 [Issue 13719] std.datetime no longer compiles when trivial destructor is added | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13719 hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx --- Comment #1 from hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx --- I don't understand, why is this a Phobos bug rather than a dmd bug? -- | |||
Permalink
ReplyNovember 12, 2014 [Issue 13719] std.datetime no longer compiles when trivial destructor is added | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13719 --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> --- (In reply to hsteoh from comment #1) > I don't understand, why is this a Phobos bug rather than a dmd bug? Don't know which it is until it is reduced. -- | |||
November 12, 2014 [Issue 13719] std.datetime no longer compiles when trivial destructor is added | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13719 Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |code@dawg.eu --- Comment #3 from Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> --- For some reason it only occurs on Windows. -- | |||
November 13, 2014 [Issue 13719] std.datetime no longer compiles when trivial destructor is added | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13719 Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thecybershadow@gmail.com -- | |||
November 17, 2014 [Issue 13719] std.datetime no longer compiles when trivial destructor is added | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13719 David Nadlinger <code@klickverbot.at> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |code@klickverbot.at Component|Phobos |DMD --- Comment #4 from David Nadlinger <code@klickverbot.at> --- I don't see why adding a trivial destructor should break the piece of Phobos code in question (it doesn't use anything that explicitly checks for an elaborate dtor), so it's likely a DMD bug. -- | |||
December 08, 2021 [Issue 13719] std.datetime no longer compiles when trivial destructor is added | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13719 Stanislav Blinov <stanislav.blinov@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stanislav.blinov@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Stanislav Blinov <stanislav.blinov@gmail.com> --- 7 years later, adding the same dtor to Date and building unittests yields this on Linux: Error: `this.__invariant` is not `nothrow` Error: `this.__invariant` is not `nothrow` std/datetime/date.d(2344): Error: template instance `std.datetime.date.Date.opBinary!"-"` error instantiating std/datetime/date.d(2356): instantiated from here: `opBinary!"-"` Error: `this.__invariant` is not `nothrow` -- | |||
December 13 [Issue 13719] std.datetime no longer compiles when trivial destructor is added | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13719 --- Comment #6 from dlangBugzillaToGithub <robert.schadek@posteo.de> --- THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB https://github.com/dlang/dmd/issues/18912 DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- | |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation