https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14018

--- Comment #1 from Denis Shelomovskij <verylonglogin.reg@gmail.com> ---
Personally I'm against this language change as IMO:
* it creates a very strange exceptional rule in type system
* and I don't see much profit from it in real coding.

Here is an example of introduced language complication:
---
int[] f(int i) { return new int[1]; }

mixin template T()
{
    immutable s = f(0); // OK or error? Depends on context.
}

mixin T; // OK here

void main()
{
    mixin T; // error here
}
---


Note:
This issue is created as a result of Issue 7492 discussion.

P.S.
My general position is to not complicate the language without valuable profit
in real projects even in cases of much smaller and non-exceptional rules.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14018

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P1                          |P4

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14018

--- Comment #2 from dlangBugzillaToGithub <robert.schadek@posteo.de> ---
THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

https://github.com/dlang/dmd/issues/18931

DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

--