On 23 Feb 2014 09:30, "Joseph Rushton Wakeling" < joseph.wakeling@webdrake.net> wrote:
>
> On 21/02/2014 18:09, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>>
>> It's not quite ready to replace the current script yet, as a number of dmd options are still not handled (or not completely handled) yet.
>
>
> Do you have a todo list ... ?

If so, put it on the wiki or raise separate bugs for each in bugzilla to allow us to keep track what needs implementing.

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 09:38:09AM +0000, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 23 Feb 2014 09:30, "Joseph Rushton Wakeling" < joseph.wakeling@webdrake.net> wrote:
> >
> > On 21/02/2014 18:09, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >>
> >> It's not quite ready to replace the current script yet, as a number of dmd options are still not handled (or not completely handled) yet.
> >
> >
> > Do you have a todo list ... ?

Unfortunately, no. But basically, most of the remaining task is just to implement DMD option. The basic compile-and-link step is already working, but ddoc isn't handled yet, along with a whole bunch of dmd options that will probably require changing the way the compiling and linking is done, etc..

Just try it out yourself to see what works / doesn't work, and you'll see. :)

The parseArgs function is where you'd start looking, to see what has / hasn't been implemented as far as options go.


> If so, put it on the wiki or raise separate bugs for each in bugzilla to allow us to keep track what needs implementing.

Should we be putting tickets in bugzilla when the dport branch isn't even merged yet?


T

-- 
Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.

On 27 February 2014 19:10, H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 09:38:09AM +0000, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 23 Feb 2014 09:30, "Joseph Rushton Wakeling" < joseph.wakeling@webdrake.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 21/02/2014 18:09, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It's not quite ready to replace the current script yet, as a number of dmd options are still not handled (or not completely handled) yet.
>> >
>> >
>> > Do you have a todo list ... ?
>
> Unfortunately, no. But basically, most of the remaining task is just to implement DMD option. The basic compile-and-link step is already working, but ddoc isn't handled yet, along with a whole bunch of dmd options that will probably require changing the way the compiling and linking is done, etc..
>
> Just try it out yourself to see what works / doesn't work, and you'll see. :)
>
> The parseArgs function is where you'd start looking, to see what has / hasn't been implemented as far as options go.
>
>
>> If so, put it on the wiki or raise separate bugs for each in bugzilla to allow us to keep track what needs implementing.
>
> Should we be putting tickets in bugzilla when the dport branch isn't even merged yet?
>

Yes, you can use these as project tasks/goals to remind anyone what is left to do. You could also create a separate branch as a staging area to merge the current changes in. :)