Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
October 20, 2014 [Issue 9066] Add constructor inheritance feature | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9066 --- Comment #15 from Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> --- This has been requested before by Sean Kelly with a good description. http://forum.dlang.org/thread/f3pisd$4vi$3@digitalmars.com -- |
October 20, 2014 [Issue 9066] Add constructor inheritance feature | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9066 --- Comment #16 from Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> --- We should probably write a DIP for it. -- |
September 04, 2016 [Issue 9066] Add constructor inheritance feature | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9066 --- Comment #17 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #13) > - You can use @disable this(int) in the derived class to selectively > disable some of the super class constructors. Thinking about this now, I think this specific point may be a bad idea since the base class may be in a 3rd part library. If the authors of the base class introduce yet another new constructor you have to be vigilant and check if you need to add any new @disable this(...) declarations in your own subclass. This is similar to the base class method hijacking problem https://dlang.org/hijack.html ("Base Class Member Function Hijacking"), but it would be a bigger problem for constructors as listed in https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9066#c8 I'll begin working on a DIP. -- |
September 04, 2016 [Issue 9066] Add constructor inheritance feature | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9066 --- Comment #18 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> --- https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/42 -- |
September 04, 2016 [Issue 9066] Add constructor inheritance feature | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9066 --- Comment #19 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Andrej Mitrovic from comment #18) > https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/42 And yes I omitted the whole `super(Arguments)` stuff as I believe it would complicate the implementation. C++11 doesn't seem to add support for inheriting specific constructors, and it seems that wasn't a cause for concern. -- |
December 17, 2022 [Issue 9066] Add constructor inheritance feature | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9066 Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P2 |P4 -- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation