https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22091

Max Samukha <maxsamukha@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |maxsamukha@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Max Samukha <maxsamukha@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Sharon Hadas from comment #0)
> When using a variadic template parameter in a function, it is possible to define another parameter afterwards. This behaves in the expected way in most cases, however when the parameter is a default parameter, it is impossible to pass anything into it, since the variadic parameter seems to be greedy and always takes in whatever is passed to it.
> 
> Here's an example that shows this behaviour:
> 
> import std;
> void variadic(Args...)(Args args) {
>     writefln("variadic - Args len is %s", args.length);
>     variadic2(args, 5);
> }
> void variadic2(Args...)(Args args, int anotherArg = 4) {
>     writefln("variadic2 - Args len is %s, args is %s, anotherArg is %s",
> args.length, args, anotherArg);
> }
> void main()
> {
>     variadic();
> }
> 
> This example prints (seems to be consistent across compilers and operating
> systems):
> 
> variadic - Args len is 0
> variadic2 - Args len is 1, args is 5, anotherArg is 4
> 
> This is counterintuitive behaviour. I think the correct behaviour in this case would be for it to not compile.

FWIW, you can use explicit instantiation to work around this particular case:

import std;
void variadic(Args...)(Args args) {
    writefln("variadic - Args len is %s", args.length);
    variadic2!Args(args, 5);
}
void variadic2(Args...)(Args args, int anotherArg = 4) {
    writefln("variadic2 - Args len is %s, anotherArg is %s", args.length, args,
anotherArg);
}
void main()
{
    variadic();
}

variadic - Args len is 0
variadic2 - Args len is 0, anotherArg is 5

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22091

--- Comment #2 from Max Samukha <maxsamukha@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Max Samukha from comment #1)

> FWIW, you can use explicit instantiation to work around this particular case:

Never mind. That's useless.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22091

--- Comment #3 from Max Samukha <maxsamukha@gmail.com> ---
Just for kicks, this seems to simulate the expected behavior:

import std;
void variadic2(Args...)(Args args)
{
    static if (Args.length && is(Args[$ - 1]: int)) {
        alias anotherArg = args[$ - 1];
        alias _args = args[0..$ - 1];
    } else {
        int anotherArg = 5;
        alias _args = args;
    }

    writefln("variadic2 - Args len is %s, anotherArg is %s", _args.length,
anotherArg);
}

void main()
{
    variadic2();
    variadic2(4);
    variadic2(2, "foo");
    variadic2(2, 3);
}


variadic2 - Args len is 0, anotherArg is 5
variadic2 - Args len is 0, anotherArg is 4
variadic2 - Args len is 2, anotherArg is 5
variadic2 - Args len is 1, anotherArg is 3

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22091

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P1                          |P3

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22091

--- Comment #4 from dlangBugzillaToGithub <robert.schadek@posteo.de> ---
THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

https://github.com/dlang/dmd/issues/19957

DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

--