https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3878

Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dmitry.olsh@gmail.com

--- Comment #14 from Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh@gmail.com> ---
If it were to ever happen it needs a DIP.

// is super common idiom and nobody is buffled by what is happening here this.x = x;

// Now this should be caught be compiler just using the heuristic
// "pure expression with its results discarded"
x = x;

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3878

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P2                          |P4

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3878

RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #15 from RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> ---
I am also opposed to this enhancement. This check may be implemented by a third party tool using dmd as a library. In fact, IIRC d-scanner already has such a check. Since it is a matter of preference, folks can use it or not by running D-scanner on their code.

Closing as WONTFIX.

--