https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18876

Jonathan M Davis <issues.dlang@jmdavisProg.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |issues.dlang@jmdavisProg.co
                   |                            |m

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <issues.dlang@jmdavisProg.com> ---
The cases of a free function used without UFCS, a free function used with UFCS, and a member function are all different, and the number of parameters required differs. So, the spec needs to be clarified in that respect. Point #8 is correct for a free function used without UFCS or a member function, but it's wrong for a free function used with UFCS. A free function used with UFCS needs on extra parameter for both the getter and setter - hence why it's possible to have a setter property with two parameters.

But regardless, that whole section of the spec needs to be rewritten anyway, since while it was intended at one point that property functions be controlled by @property, that never actually happened. So, all of these rules relate to using any function as a property and aren't actually affected by @property.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18876

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P1                          |P2

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18876

--- Comment #2 from dlangBugzillaToGithub <robert.schadek@posteo.de> ---
THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/issues/4088

DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

--