Thread overview | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 25, 2009 [Issue 2690] New: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2690 Summary: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set Product: D Version: 1.040 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla@digitalmars.com ReportedBy: larsivar@igesund.net I don't know how common it is, but at least Ubuntu has a standard environment variable called MALLOC_CHECK_ which typically is set to 2. When it is set, memory allocations are checked (it can also be set to 3). However, with DMD 1.040 this causes an "Aborted" message. Setting MALLOC_CHECK_ to 0 makes it work again. I have tried to narrow down where it happens, but I seem to fail to get it much shorter than the following (and it seems that Exception itself from object.di may be involved): class PlatformException : Exception { this(char[] msg) { super(msg); } } class AssertException : Exception { this(char[] file, size_t line) { super("Assertion failure",file,line); } this(char[] msg, char[] file, size_t line) { super(msg,file,line); } } void setAssertHandler(int){ } This is a regression in DMD 1.040 -- |
February 25, 2009 Re: [Issue 2690] New: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to d-bugmail | Also happens in dmd 2.025 When MALLOC_CHECK_ set to 1, I get the following message: *** glibc detected *** dmd: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x08d2c6a8 *** Segmentation fault |
February 26, 2009 Re: [Issue 2690] New: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Lutger | On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:27:43 +0300, Lutger <lutger.blijdestijn@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also happens in dmd 2.025
>
> When MALLOC_CHECK_ set to 1, I get the following message:
>
> *** glibc detected *** dmd: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x08d2c6a8 ***
> Segmentation fault
>
Perhaps, you may want to post it to bugzilla, instead?
|
February 26, 2009 Re: [Issue 2690] New: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Denis Koroskin | On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Denis Koroskin <2korden@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:27:43 +0300, Lutger <lutger.blijdestijn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Also happens in dmd 2.025
>>
>> When MALLOC_CHECK_ set to 1, I get the following message:
>>
>> *** glibc detected *** dmd: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x08d2c6a8 ***
>> Segmentation fault
>>
>
> Perhaps, you may want to post it to bugzilla, instead?
It's supposed to work, i.e. responding to the NG thread is supposed to post to the Bugzilla as well. It just stopped working a couple months ago..
|
February 26, 2009 Re: [Issue 2690] New: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jarrett Billingsley | On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:24:06 +0300, Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Denis Koroskin <2korden@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:27:43 +0300, Lutger <lutger.blijdestijn@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Also happens in dmd 2.025 >>> >>> When MALLOC_CHECK_ set to 1, I get the following message: >>> >>> *** glibc detected *** dmd: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x08d2c6a8 *** >>> Segmentation fault >>> >> >> Perhaps, you may want to post it to bugzilla, instead? > > It's supposed to work, i.e. responding to the NG thread is supposed to > post to the Bugzilla as well. It just stopped working a couple months > ago.. Yeah, I know. That's why I suggested to re-submit the post to bugzilla. I actually like the way it is, it allows commenting the reports while sidestepping the bugzilla. This is useful if your comment is worthless anyway. Just like this one :) |
February 26, 2009 [Issue 2690] DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to d-bugmail | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2690 ------- Comment #1 from bugzilla@digitalmars.com 2009-02-26 04:19 ------- I didn't know about MALLOC_CHECK_. It's a great feature, and I found the (off by one) problem. -- |
February 27, 2009 Re: [Issue 2690] New: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Denis Koroskin | Denis Koroskin wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:27:43 +0300, Lutger <lutger.blijdestijn@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Also happens in dmd 2.025 >> >> When MALLOC_CHECK_ set to 1, I get the following message: >> >> *** glibc detected *** dmd: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x08d2c6a8 *** >> Segmentation fault >> > > Perhaps, you may want to post it to bugzilla, instead? I see that's not working now anymore, good to know. Anyway it seems Walter already solved it. |
March 11, 2009 [Issue 2690] DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to d-bugmail | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2690 bugzilla@digitalmars.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #2 from bugzilla@digitalmars.com 2009-03-11 14:54 ------- Fixed dmd 1.041 and 2.026 -- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation