Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May 15, 2019 [Issue 19875] [betterC] dmd 2.0.86 Allowed class compile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19875 joaopaulo1339@outlook.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |betterC -- |
May 15, 2019 [Issue 19875] [betterC] dmd 2.0.86 Allowed class compile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19875 Seb <greeenify@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greeenify@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Seb <greeenify@gmail.com> --- Why should it? What gave you the impression that it should be? BetterC doesn't support class allocation (via GC) yet. In general, classes are a bit challenging with betterC Though, I recommend reading this great article: https://theartofmachinery.com/2018/08/13/inheritance_and_polymorphism_2.html -- |
May 15, 2019 [Issue 19875] [betterC] dmd 2.0.86 Allowed class compile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19875 --- Comment #2 from joaopaulo1339@outlook.com --- (In reply to Seb from comment #1) > Why should it? > What gave you the impression that it should be? > > BetterC doesn't support class allocation (via GC) yet. > > In general, classes are a bit challenging with betterC > > Though, I recommend reading this great article: > > https://theartofmachinery.com/2018/08/13/inheritance_and_polymorphism_2.html Because D BetterC page list classes as an removed feature https://dlang.org/spec/betterc.html#consequences So, if classes are removed, why my example compiles just fine? -- |
May 15, 2019 [Issue 19875] [betterC] dmd 2.0.86 Allowed class compile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19875 Richard Cattermole <alphaglosined@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alphaglosined@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Richard Cattermole <alphaglosined@gmail.com> --- The above snippet does indeed compile and run on Windows (I added the pragma). dmd is including druntime/phobos into the build automatically and has since at least 2.082. Which is providing symbols that shouldn't be available (run.dlang.org it fails on as expected). -- |
May 15, 2019 [Issue 19875] [betterC] dmd 2.0.86 Allowed class compile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19875 kinke@gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kinke@gmx.net --- Comment #4 from kinke@gmx.net --- The reason for this behavior is apparently the extern(D) main function. Make that extern(C), and druntime/Phobos isn't linked. - There's a DMD special case for Windows targets, where the object file containing the D main function gets an embedded linker directive to pull in the library. -- |
December 27, 2022 [Issue 19875] [betterC] dmd 2.0.86 Allowed class compile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19875 Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID -- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation