On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:47:01PM +0100, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
> What kind of help would you need? It's already quite efficient and would complement quite well the search already present on the Phobos pages.

I'll probably want people's suggestions for tagging functions. Though it is working well enough already that I might be able to handle it myself.

What would probably be most valuable is collecting data from searches that didn't work - if you punched in some terms that came up with nothing or garbage instead of what you expected.

I think I can automate this to some degree. Log people's searches and what page they ultimately went to, then eyeball those logs to fix up the search rankings.


Anyway, I'll post to the group and/or write a note on the dpldocs homepage if I need more than that. In the mean time, if anyone searches for an intuitive term and it doesn't work, let me know. Experienced users are invaluable for that.

> Trick question: what about the changes in Phobos coming with each new DMD version?

To generate the database I have now, I wrote a small program (in D - http://dpldocs.info/src/gen.d ) to pull the <a name> tags out of the generated Phobos docs and put them in a database.

Pulling it out of the ddoc generated html ensures I get everything that
has a  page I can link to, and nothing that doesn't, avoiding 404s on Digital
Mars.

When the new dmd comes out, I'll just run that program again. Then, I just have to fix up the tags part of database, to ensure they are still associated with the right functions. That should be easy enough to automate too, though I'm just doing it by hand so far, since there are so few tags in there.

-- 
Adam D. Ruppe
http://arsdnet.net