December 13, 2019
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20308

timon.gehr@gmx.ch changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |timon.gehr@gmx.ch

--- Comment #1 from timon.gehr@gmx.ch ---
Unfortunately the reason for this regression is that the bug I fixed was masking another unrelated bug. I.e., this is not my fault and I cannot fix it very easily. DMD doesn't know that your handler lambdas do not need a frame pointer at the time it checks for frame pointer accessibility. Due to the bug fixed in https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10214, DMD used to think that the lambdas are not nested in a function.

The following workaround makes the code compile:

void main(){
    static handler0(double z){ return z; }
    static handler1(T)(T y){ return y; }
    assert(
        S!(handler0, handler1)
        .call!(r => r(1))()
    == 1);
}

This allows DMD to see that the handlers are static functions without analyzing their bodies.

--
December 13
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20308

--- Comment #2 from dlangBugzillaToGithub <robert.schadek@posteo.de> ---
THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

https://github.com/dlang/dmd/issues/19631

DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

--