Thread overview | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 15, 2012 DMD 2.x compiler in Arch Linux repo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=dmd Since today 2.x branch of dmd is in Arch Linux [community] repo, replacing 1.x branch. |
January 15, 2012 Re: DMD 2.x compiler in Arch Linux repo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Михаил Страшун | Al 15/01/12 23:16, En/na Михаил Страшун ha escrit: > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=dmd > > Since today 2.x branch of dmd is in Arch Linux [community] repo, replacing 1.x branch. > Very good news! It works like a charm. Congratulations! Just one question. Why you place the phobos modules at /usr/include/d instead of an specific phobos folder? Best regards, -- Jordi Sayol |
January 15, 2012 Re: DMD 2.x compiler in Arch Linux repo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Yaaaaay! So happy!
Finally there's no hard choice to make which package
to choose from the AUR! And it works perfectly out-
of-the-box!
On 15 January 2012 23:57, Jordi Sayol <g.sayol@yahoo.es> wrote:
> Al 15/01/12 23:16, En/na Михаил Страшун ha escrit:
>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=dmd
>>
>> Since today 2.x branch of dmd is in Arch Linux [community] repo, replacing 1.x branch.
>>
>
> Very good news!
>
> It works like a charm. Congratulations!
>
> Just one question. Why you place the phobos modules at /usr/include/d instead of an specific phobos folder?
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Jordi Sayol
>
|
January 16, 2012 Re: DMD 2.x compiler in Arch Linux repo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Михаил Страшун | On 1/15/12 4:16 PM, Михаил Страшун wrote:
> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=dmd
>
> Since today 2.x branch of dmd is in Arch Linux [community] repo,
> replacing 1.x branch.
Awesome! Should I announce that on reddit?
Andrei
|
January 16, 2012 Re: DMD 2.x compiler in Arch Linux repo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Михаил Страшун | On 01/15/2012 04:16 PM, Михаил Страшун wrote:
> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=dmd
>
> Since today 2.x branch of dmd is in Arch Linux [community] repo,
> replacing 1.x branch.
Oh wow, I was just complaining about that the other day on their IRC channel and the dmd-complete package (which was the AUR package that essentially did what the current dmd package does).
Much rejoicing, this makes life less complicated.
Although, there was *already* a dmd package before this for D1. I guess they just dropped it. I still don't see why dmd for D2 isn't just dmd2 to simplify things.
|
January 16, 2012 Re: DMD 2.x compiler in Arch Linux repo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Михаил Страшун Attachments: | On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:16:23 +0100 "Михаил Страшун" <none@none.none> wrote: > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=dmd > > Since today 2.x branch of dmd is in Arch Linux [community] repo, replacing 1.x branch. Great news! Sincerely, Gour(uninstalling dmd2-complete and installing dmd package) -- One who restrains the senses of action but whose mind dwells on sense objects certainly deludes himself and is called a pretender. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 |
January 16, 2012 Re: DMD 2.x compiler in Arch Linux repo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Al 15/01/12 23:57, En/na Jordi Sayol ha escrit: > Al 15/01/12 23:16, En/na Михаил Страшун ha escrit: >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=dmd >> >> Since today 2.x branch of dmd is in Arch Linux [community] repo, replacing 1.x branch. >> > > Very good news! > > It works like a charm. Congratulations! > > Just one question. Why you place the phobos modules at /usr/include/d instead of an specific phobos folder? > I see that you included "libdruntime.a" and "libphobos2.a" libraries, but your "libphobos2.a" contains all "libdruntime.a" objects, so they're duplicated. You can install "libphobos2.a" alone, or just build it without "libdruntime.a" in it. -- Jordi Sayol |
January 16, 2012 Re: DMD 2.x compiler in Arch Linux repo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jordi Sayol | It looks like there is a misunderstanding here - I am not a maintainer of this package in Arch repo. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Svenstaro is. Any improvement proposals should be sent to him, I suppose. For now it looks like he have just taken dmd2 AUR package I have been maintaining and it wasn't really in best form. I have been mostly updating versions, md5 sums and making sure everything compiles. Sorry about that, wanted to rewrite PKGBUILD completely, but was pleasantly surprised by adoption of package to [community] before found enough time for this. On Sunday, 15 January 2012 at 22:57:13 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote: > Al 15/01/12 23:16, En/na Михаил Страшун ha escrit: >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=dmd >> >> Since today 2.x branch of dmd is in Arch Linux [community] repo, replacing 1.x branch. >> > > Very good news! > > It works like a charm. Congratulations! > > Just one question. Why you place the phobos modules at /usr/include/d instead of an specific phobos folder? > > Best regards, |
January 16, 2012 Re: DMD 2.x compiler in Arch Linux repo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | Are there any negative consequences of doing this? :) Sorry, I know close to nothing about reddit.
On Monday, 16 January 2012 at 00:33:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 1/15/12 4:16 PM, Михаил Страшун wrote:
>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=dmd
>>
>> Since today 2.x branch of dmd is in Arch Linux [community] repo,
>> replacing 1.x branch.
>
> Awesome! Should I announce that on reddit?
>
> Andrei
|
January 16, 2012 Re: DMD 2.x compiler in Arch Linux repo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Михаил Страшун | On 1/16/12 2:05 PM, Михаил Страшун wrote:
> Are there any negative consequences of doing this? :) Sorry, I know
> close to nothing about reddit.
The news must be noteworthy. My question is basically "Is this an interesting piece of news, or something minor"?
Andrei
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation