On 06/18/2015 04:53 PM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:

> On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 21:38:59 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:

>> About returning scoped!C, I think it works:

> I just find out that the document of scoped says that "It's

Thanks for fixing the typo there. (The documentations has lower case: "it's". ;) )

> illegal to
> move a class instance

Wait! You fixed that as well? :) The doc that I am looking at says "class reference":

  http://dlang.org/phobos/std_typecons.html#.scoped

> even if you are sure there are no pointers to it.
> As such, it is illegal to move a scoped object."
>
> So this is not a solution?

I guess not. :-/

Ali

On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 00:00:50 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 06/18/2015 04:53 PM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 21:38:59 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>
> >> About returning scoped!C, I think it works:
>
> > I just find out that the document of scoped says that "It's
>
> Thanks for fixing the typo there. (The documentations has lower case: "it's". ;) )
>
> > illegal to
> > move a class instance
>
> Wait! You fixed that as well? :) The doc that I am looking at says "class reference":
>
>   http://dlang.org/phobos/std_typecons.html#.scoped

Those are fixed by: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3016

>
> > even if you are sure there are no pointers to it.
> > As such, it is illegal to move a scoped object."
> >
> > So this is not a solution?
>
> I guess not. :-/
>
> Ali

I don't understand. What problem can moving a scoped cause when there's no reference to its inner class?

On 06/18/2015 05:25 PM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:

> What problem can moving a scoped cause when there's
> no reference to its inner class?

I am curious as well. Could it be related to the object's 'monitor'? Perhaps some other code may have a reference to monitor? And that reference does not constitute as a reference to the object itself? I don't know.

Ali